Woot, found the reference (that I had wanted to include in the previous post)!

I wanted to reference this statement I made waaay back (well, like exactly one year) in the previous blog post, but since so many posts on this blog contain the words "belief," "dopamine," and "sociopath," it was a little difficult to find which post this statement was made in, via searching for the terms.

From the post Controlled Dopamine Release's Influence in Sociopathism, and for Health, and referenced once already in the post Managing and Increasing Dopamine Can Easily Add Years to a Person's Life and Good Health, I wrote:

If a person can take control of their belief, they can freely give themselves the same continuous positive experience that Cocaine delivers, which is exactly what some sociopaths and highly active people feel as their regular state and think nothing of it.

So, the above statement covers the larger understanding of what was recognized in the study referenced in the previous post:

Smokers get a rush of dopamine when nicotine from a cigarette enters their body.

It's this chemical reaction that means so many people are addicted to smoking.

But scientists believe there is something else at play - a smoker's belief in the chemical reaction can also change their cravings. 

In a study, researchers have discovered that if smokers don’t think they are getting nicotine, the rush of dopamine never arrives.

The perceptions of the nicotine study also corroborate everything that I've been saying about dopamine, including its identity as not being "reward", but mental-task processing fuel, which is utilized whenever Reason causes a mind to consider, such as when something is less than OK (for example, a craving), and which is increased in availability when a mind resolves considerings related to not being OK, and believes that everything is OK. The difference between "reward" and physio-fuel is perfectly antithetical in the resultant understanding of the importance of dopamine for a human brain, moving it from being of the least consideration and arriving as an after-effect, to one of primary importance that is required at the beginning of all effort, and to prevent mental and physical stress, vulnerability, damage, and failure.

This essentially means that contemporary medicine and drug, as well as drug-crime policies are basically all just backwards, and life-stealing shit, and that those people in professions where they rationalize away people's natural right to dopamine are cruel monsters, and hypocritical fraudsters.

Also, I want to point out that having some study corroborate what I say is not what makes what I say the truth. The opinions, ideology, and dogma of a billion sociopaths will not alter the truth, and any number of people who act out of determination, such as an ideology, will all equally be found to have been False, in the end.

When a paid health worker speaks of "reward" and "addiction", they speak from their ignorance, from their sociopathic wishes, from their desire to experience "reward," and from their prejudice. But when I say that addiction does not exist, that dopamine is physio-fuel, and that employing "addiction" as if it were a truthful concept creates the very harms that are those who use the concept typically attribute to drugs, I speak from the truth, and the truth speaks through me.

And I know the truth of far more than these things. In truth, if I will it, this entire planet will be transformed into a planet of gods, both good and evil. And if I will it, this entire planet will be separated from true knowledge. Because in me are all the keys to true knowledge, and I make them known as I reason is good.

And just as when asked "Who do you think you are?" by the day's religious professionals in reaction to claiming to know God, Jesus responded, "If I were to say that I do not know him, I would be a liar like you," so it is with what I have said.

Shrapnel

Articles: 'Belief concerning nicotine drives behaviour and dopamine availability' & The Experience of Considering

i.

Here are a few articles, which all are about the same study:

Belief in nicotine's powers can increase addiction

Belief about nicotine content in cigarettes can curb cravings

Level Of Smoking Addiction Determined By Smoker’s Perception Of Nicotine


Excerpt from the first article:

Smokers get a rush of dopamine when nicotine from a cigarette enters their body.

It's this chemical reaction that means so many people are addicted to smoking.

But scientists believe there is something else at play - a smoker's belief in the chemical reaction can also change their cravings. 

In a study, researchers have discovered that if smokers don’t think they are getting nicotine, the rush of dopamine never arrives.


Except from the second article:

The smokers who got the nicotine, or simply believed they did, reported reduced cravings and the scan recorded increased neural activity. 

'When they believed there is nicotine and they had nicotine, the craving correlated with these anterior insula activations — but when they did not believe so, that correlation was gone." Gu said.

"Even when they had nicotine, but did not believe there was nicotine, their brain did not respond [with higher neural activity] and they still reported as much craving as before," she said.

"Basically, you have nicotine and your brain is kind of on, but the twist here is you have to have nicotine, but also believe you have nicotine for the brain to be on," she said.

"So in other words, if you have nicotine, but did not think so — you thought you had some kind of placebo — then your brain is still off," Gu said.

While the biological pull of nicotine plays a key role in the addiction, a person's belief system can also exert a pharmacological effect, she said.

Researchers hope the study, recently published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, will tell them more about the mechanism of addiction.

"It looks like addiction is not just about the substance itself, but also the belief you need the substance to have a normal daily life," Gu said.

She said the study shows why cognitive therapy is so important in changing a smoker's beliefs.



ii.

The conclusion of this study claims to have discovered something which I've already explained in much greater detail.

Recently, in the post Article: "this is how social media affects your brain", I said:

It will be no different if a person considers pouring hot-sauce in their belly-button, or any other inane activity: Whatever a person believes in which consider within their brain, to make their person's well-being status as OK only evaluate as True when the concept that is their belief is fulfilled, which will always free up dopamine, since those considerings, conscious and sub forefront-conscious, will be resolved once their reasons are fulfilled, and considering is the work of a brain, and the work that requires dopamine to connect pieces of information in new ways.


And in the post Overview of Why Placebo Works, and Isn't Really Placebo After All, I said:

- The mechanisms of the metabolic pathway can be triggered in two ways: by decomposition of a molecule (which itself has a frequency that carries its meaning as a signal and equates to a ‘This Is’ declaration upon whatever it contacts), or by a reasoned thought-signal that contains the same declarative information


I also talked on the same theme in the post The Placebo Effect is Belief Freeing Up Dopamine to Help Healing Consider



iii.

I wish it wouldn't be said in the news articles about this study'd finding that "scientists believe there is something else at play," or that science would be mentioned at all, since the greatest understanding of these things comes from me, and I did not use any science to come to know them, or read any similar understanding from any scientist's work before I spoke these things from my own knowing. In fact, when I spoke them, it was in complete opposition to and rejection of everything I'd ever heard said from the perspectives of those calling themselves scientists. I knew the truth because of Reason, and I spoke it because it is the truth. To indicate science in this is to hijack some of the full understanding's considerations, and align them in ways which spoil the image of truth of the matter.


No science was needed to know, with certainty, that this happens, because its understanding is simply inherent in the knowledge that dopamine is a brain's work potential, and that considering is a brain's work for which dopamine is required, that considering is a streaming of considerations, that a consideration is polar, that a mind is all-factoring and inter-dependent, and that belief is a 'This Is' command upon which Reason immutably acts.

There is no test, observation, research, studying, institutions, regulations needed to know even the greatest of truths. There is simply belief, considering, knowing.



iv.

As Tesla said, “My brain is only a receiver, in the Universe there is a core from which we obtain knowledge, strength and inspiration. I have not penetrated into the secrets of this core, but I know that it exists.”

Well, what is received is a streaming of considerations, which is considering. And what enables considering is belief, which is a 'This Is' command, upon which Reason acts. But an environment that is heavily falsified, such as the mind of a scientist, cannot very easily consider, because the environment of considerations which is their mind evaluates as False against all realty, because of their determinations, and so cannot produce a truthful 'This is' command, to initiate considering. But if they could, then considering is similar to this scene in Transformers.

However, in that scene, the character who information is considering through is being raped by another force, and is not in control - which, by the way, is what doctors do to synapses in people's brains whom they impose their False institutional doctrine concerning dopamine, drug-use, upon. And that is a major part of what is happening in a psychosis, which, like many other things, is only caused by a lack of dopamine to connect information to stop the broken considering processes from forcefully pushing information through synapses not in sync with all other information. And this is also what is happening in the case of autistic children being sensitive to sounds, light etc. Unfortunately, licensed medicines are, relative to cocaine, complete garbage and poison when it comes to being effective at helping against these things, because of their far worse dopamine / adrenergic effect ratios, with the adrenergic effect increasing the workload of a brain, while dopamine increases the capacity for a brain to handle larger workloads.


Considering with reasoning is also like this scene from The Fifth Element, where the character learns via watching progressive scenes on a subject, reasoning their collective meaning as the scenes progress.

With considering, and reasoning while considering, the scenes are the reasoned meaning of all known considerations, and they can consider at even millions of times the rate of those which the Fifth Element character is watching in the given clip. And the individual scenes are made of great expanses of considerations, connecting across many dimensions. And the considered scenes themselves can even be living, with their contents being living experiences of the considerations which make them.

Einstein engaged a basic level of this when he thought in pictures, and came up with his theory of relativity. But neither Einstein, nor Tesla, though they engaged considering at basic levels, knew the greater reality of these things. They neither identified the movement and interaction of considerations as a knowledge to grow, and only focused on producing works in their fields via their individual abilities as they were without any recognition for what the difference was between their minds and other people's.

But, Jesus had already spoken the same as Tesla's "My brain is only a receiver" comment, when saying "By myself I can do nothing; I judge only as I hear, and my judgment is just, for I seek not to please myself but him who sent me." And considering grows into forms far greater and more magnificent than either of these examples, or the capabilities Tesla and Einstein possessed.



v.

While Tesla was fascinated by what the small could be made to do, and worked upon the small with a separation between it and himself, I know the full resolution, Reason, which gives the small its meaning and purpose, and by knowing Reason, I also know all the considerations which resolve into it, not as an outsider, but as an equal, and as one mind, with the shared sight of all who are in Reason. These considerations not only reveal the truth about what is, but they also are what is.

If I'm willing, I can write what resolves everything that all those working in the field of physics seek, and far greater, in a single post. But, as of now, I am not resolved to do this.

A truthful person and a sociopath speak from different devices. A truthful person only speaks what has already been fully considered, and which is already true and reason. A falsehood-bearing person makes determinations about what is, and speaks their determinations without knowing anything. In the truthful person, the truth is their leading considering, and their self is placed last. In the falsehood-bearing person, their own self is their leading consideration, and the truth is placed last. By determining ones self ahead of the truth, the possibility for the truth to present is falsified.

What good is all the information in the universe if it is achieved by determination, and so is outside of you, and therefore you and that information as one is not the truth? The movement of considerations evaluating True into one another is life, and as Jesus said, "Truly, I tell all of you emphatically, if anyone keeps my word, he will never see death," and also, "What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

Making determinations reduces connectivity between considerations. If everything a person has is by making determinations upon what they perceive as being outside of themselves, then there is little connection between the determiner, and all the things that they imposed determinations upon. So how will a person be able to consider through those things so that their life will continue? They will be vulnerable to the "outer darkness" that Jesus spoke of, and these words: "But God said to him, 'You fool! This very night your life will be demanded from you. Then who will get what you have prepared for yourself? This is how it will be with whoever stores up things for themselves but is not rich toward God."

So, what if all that a person has aligned themselves to is a granfalloon? That granfalloon as a whole does not consider into the truth.



vi.

Now, back to the articles about nicotine cravings being subdued by a belief which resolving anxious considering thereby freeing up dopamine-availability, thereby increasing a person's well-being and functionality.

At the end of the CBC article, this is printed:

Researchers hope the study, recently published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, will tell them more about the mechanism of addiction.

"It looks like addiction is not just about the substance itself, but also the belief you need the substance to have a normal daily life," Gu said.


A tremendous fallacy in these statements is the use of the term "addiction," which shows that the mind speaking such is carrying determinations which are causing their considering to collapse into falsehood.

Inherent within the term of addiction are considerations which speak that a person has no control, that a person is not acting by controlled choice, and that a person's behaviour is not acceptable. If a person accepts the term of addiction as True, then Reason will cause the considerations within their own mind, which form those messages, to align in a manner which is against their own personal strength and ability to overcome. Addiction doesn't exist in the truth, but is an imposition which sociopaths place upon others in order to dominate and exploit those people. By accepting the idea of addiction, a person is choosing to allow  be dominated by its concepts.

Accepting the message of addiction is the same as accepting the message of "you can't," which doesn't allow considerations to pass, which makes it impossible for a person to overcome. And this is the great deceit, theft, and treachery behind Alcoholics Anonymous, as well as government and institutional anti-drug messaging, which has been cultivating non-confident drug usage, which is the cause of all the problems which those in government and institutional medicine continue to try to attribute to drugs.


I spoke the following, in the post: Adendum - Migraines are Dopamine Deficiency - and also: The Importance of Tact in Dopaminergic Application - and also: The Importance of Considering the Truth

(I've also now added a link to the above, in this blog's previous post: Article: "Percocet Ruins Lives", But It Saved This Woman's)

Considerations have polarity, and receive their identity as relative to one another. And such a belief aligns certain considerations in a negative manner, and for as long as it evaluates as True towards the activity a person is engaging in, all signals relating to that activity will pass through that consideration, and receive an antagonistic influence, a quantum of negative consideration-value, which can infect the whole mind. And increasing adrenaline and noradrenaline will accelerate the considering of those things that are worries, and progressively amplify the presence of negative consideration-value in the brain until a time when things settle down and they can be reconsidered into normalcy. This is where drug-induced anxiety and psychosis come from - there is nothing inherent in the drugs taken themselves that cause thes)e things, but it is a contagion created by doctors, scientists, and government, out of their sociopathic inclinations to attempt to justify their own statuses by demeaning and harming those of others, who they deem as targets for their prejudice.
...
Also, ironically, when anti-drug propaganda is being administered to a society, there is a growth in sociopathism within that society, and a reduction in intelligence within that society, and the harms put into children and teenagers are those very ones which anti-drug propaganda would have them think come from drugs: Considering is the mechanism behind evolution, and a brain develops its connections through the course of considering. Those connections themselves represent the considerations of a person's mind, and greater Truth is manifest the more considerations are accounted for within an environment - and considerations which resolve into one form concepts. A determination is like a road-block that prevents considering from occurring - and the more determinations held in a mind, the less presence of truth there is in that mind, and the more selfish and sociopathic it is likely to be.



And just as I said in this post:

The considerations that are being held in the concept of science have their truthful placements elsewhere, and science must be discarded so that the truth may appear.

And as I spoke similarly concerning memories, in this post, it is the same regarding harmful drug-usage habits, where the imposed determination of "addiction" has forced the alignment of its involved considerations, in a case of 'if one then not the other', to dominate, subjugate, and exploit a person:

A person cannot overcome the traits of addiction while accepting the notion of addiction as a truth. It is a ball-and-chain that keeps people in the state of dependence upon the directives of sociopaths outside of themselves. People use drugs because they are addicted in the same sense that black people run fast because they have lots of practice from needing to get away after stealing something. Use of the denigrating term addiction is about maintaining a barrier that prevents the truth from being considered, and the upending of a long reign of sociopathic dominance over those people who are most vulnerable in society due to their low dopamine-availability, which is largely due to their considering the words of sociopaths imposed upon them as True in the first place.

Therefore, the first step to overcome any harmful drug-usage is to first believe and know that it is OK to use drugs, and that it always was. Drugs were never the problem, but harmful messaging coming from doctors, government, and scientists, rather than truthful consideration of the matter of drugs, is what really caused people to experience harms from drugs.

The symptoms of addiction cannot exist in a person unless a person first believes in the concept of addiction, and that it applies to them. And the concept of addiction did not arise because it was truth, but because sociopaths wanted a label to impose upon people other than themselves, to dominate and put them beneath themselves.



But the basis for people seeking dopamine-increasing drugs is simply that they are deficient in dopamine-availability, and therefore the solution is to increase their dopamine availability. Even where the solution is to overcome beliefs which are causing worried considering, which is diminishing their dopamine-availability, the solution is still to increase their dopamine-availability. And a person cannot overcome harmful beliefs without first having sufficient dopamine-availability to do the work of reconsidering, and therefore increasing dopamine-availability to give a brain enough physio-fuel for that work comes first.

And much of what causes diminished dopamine-availability within people who use drugs is the impression imposed upon them that there's something wrong with what they're doing. But everyone's brain runs on the effect of cocaine, and cannot perform any work without enough of it being there first.

Also, sociopaths only have lots of dopamine-availability because they have made determinations to obstruct consideration of the truth, reducing the amount of work which their brains are attempting, while means having ample dopamine-availability.

So, there very first harmful belief for a person who suffers dopamine-deficiency (which is all that "addiction" really is) to overcome, is the notion of addiction being anything other than a falsehood which keeps a person imprisoned. Without that, nothing further can be done. So, the first step to overcoming harmful drug habits is for a person to accept that it is OK to use drugs.

Related posts:

How Belief Affects Mental Stress Treatment, and the Effect that Anti-Drug Propaganda Has on Mental Health
A Simple Truth About "Addiction" Drug Use, and Trauma
Further Information on "Addiction" and Drug-Associated Health Issues, and the Environment that Produces them
Article: "Percocet Ruins Lives", But It Saved This Woman's
Woot, found the reference (that I had wanted to include in the previous post)!

Shrapnel

Article: "Percocet Ruins Lives", But It Saved This Woman's

Article: Percocet Ruins Lives, But It Saved Mine

If the article's writer better understood what is actually behind the narrative and physiology that suggests a picture of dopaminergics and other drugs as ruining lives, it is likely she would only write the first part of her article's title in parentheses: "Percocet Ruins Lives", But It Saved Mine.

Anyway...

Here's a related post from this blog: Adendum - Migraines are Dopamine Deficiency - and also: The Importance of Tact in Dopaminergic Application - and also: The Importance of Considering the Truth



i.

Imagine seeing a starving person begging a very rich and well-fed person for some food, food that would cost the very rich and well-fed person nothing to give to the starving person, not even their time, because they were paid for the time in which the starving person begged for food from the rich person... and the rich person responded to the starving person, while standing next to a table covered in food, and piling up food onto a plate for themselves, by insisting to the starving person that they've done wrong by thinking they also need food, and that they have a problem of addiction, and that they need to re-evaluate their life in a way that will get them off of food-dependency.


That is a retelling of the exchange that took place in the link-to article, where the woman described:

Last year, while I was at school, I realized that I'd forgotten my pills while visiting home. I didn't notice until, later that week, a migraine came on. After two days of hell, I went to a walk-in clinic not far from campus. The doctor, a thin, grey-haired man, glanced at me through his glasses, and asked, "What brings you in today?"

"Well," I said, "I get migraines, and I've had one for two days now. I left my medication at home over Thanksgiving. I'm going home again next week, so I just need a couple to help me get rid of this headache."

"What do you take?" he asked, without lifting his gaze from the computer screen.
"I have a prescription for Percocet."

He turned and looked at me. "How much do those go for on campus?" he said sarcastically.

"Sorry, what?" I said, confused. I began trying to explain myself. "No, you see, I have a prescription, but I left mine at home and--"

"Ya, I'm sure you do," he said, and proceeded to lecture me about my "addiction," while writing me a prescription to "get me off of it."



So, what if a person who was starving and without access to food was asking somebody with access for food, and the person they asked responded condescendingly and scolded them for having a need of food? Wouldn't such a person who treats another that way qualify as a monster? But the experiences of low dopamine can easily be far more painful and torturous than the experience of starving from lack of food, or dehydration from lack of water.



The conduct of the doctor described by the doctor perfectly resembles what I identified in the post Article: Common brain signature marks autism, attention deficit:

I would presume that a lot of the medical professionals who read this blog don't like it when I write pointed accusations at them, since viewer numbers have always dropped off a steep cliff following such statement since the beginning of the blog, but so what? They're professional murderers and thieves of people's lives, and bringers of suffering to those around the people their doctrine steals the life from. Their entire ideology has been a harmful and indefensible lie, and they've been its advocates. If those whose lives, minds, and dreams have been taken or restrained because of their choices haven't been protected, and neither have been those who truthfully spoke their dopaminergic need, then why should be the egos of those who took those people's lives, minds, and dreams, and who prop up the most malicious and deceptive facade human society ever produced?

Do they condition their willingness to engage the truth upon first having their falseness accommodated and pandered to?


What did Jesus instruct? Was it to hypocritically scold, demean, and disregard whoever asks for something, or to "Give to everyone who asks you", and "Do to others as you would have them do to you"? Did Jesus add an exception of "except where sociopathic granfalloons come into play"?

When doctors base and make their whole lives around denying other people, those most vulnerable and suffering, theirs, as well as keeping them in a state of torture, and condescending, chiding, and shaming them for even just requesting what is their only true relief, how can it be substantiated that the doctors who do this are deserving of anything which they have made for themselves?



ii.

The woman who wrote the linked-to article correctly perceived that the increase in dopamine-availability which oxycodone (the main ingredient in Percocet) provides her is the authentic, needed +1 to her dopamine-deficient state of -1. Or, perhaps the dopamine she receives from the oxycodone in Percocet is only a +6 to her dopamine-deficient state of -17, and yet the difference of being raised to only -11 would still feel like a heavenly relief.

Meanwhile, the typical doctor is probably riding on a baseline dopamine platform of +50, which they produce for themselves by believing that they are good dogs for casting the peer-approved determinations upon other people. And they feel so aggressively entitled to that dopamine-rich state, which is their failure to consider, that it is rare for one of them to open their minds to considering the actual people that they practice their professional rape upon.

To properly care for a person, the person must be considered first. When a doctor is more interested in foisting their dogma upon a person who is suffering, it is not the person they are caring for, but their ideological granfalloon, which they adamantly adhere to so that they can tell themselves what a good dog they are, and shut down all considering work in their brain to induce a greater dopamine-availability. When a doctor acts as the one described by the woman who wrote the linked-to article, they are literally jacking off their brains via their sociopathic stupidity, while chiding a person for recognizing their personal actual need for the same dopamine that the doctor is desperately trying to build up in their science-addled brain.

But since for all things there is an ordering of considerations, and in a case of 'if one then not the other', when a doctor lets their dogmas and granfalloons evaluate as True, so that they can beat a patient with them, then their consideration of the person who is their patient evaluates as False. And without considering the person as they express themselves, they have not cared for the person.



iii.

Also, notice that the doctor described in the woman's article defaulted to a determination about the woman as soon as she described her situation and made her request. The considerations a person puts forth is rolling-out of a blueprint that reveals precisely how their brain is wired. In the case of the doctor described, that person has allocated their determinations to be of greater importance than giving room to let the truth be considered. Because a determination is a falsehood by nature, saying 'these considerations, but not these others', it falsifies the output of any considering that emanates from it:

The Will by which a thing is considered is the Will that is returned at the end of the considering. And the Will placed into a determination is an evaluation of False towards the truth, which is carried through all the considering that streams from that determination, and outputs a conclusion that will be perfectly-antithetical to the truth in some manner, just like in the case of 'dopamine as reward'.

Just as much as it is impossible for a mathematical statement to express a truthful answer if one of its variables is changed from its True form, it is just the same with considering. Determining a false ordering of considerations falsifies the whole work. And it is precisely and only because mathematics obeys the rule of Reason (which I will illustrate at some point) that it works.


 Because the doctor so easily imposed a determination, which he then proceeded to consider as True by act of will, it means that the doctor's mind is wired for falsehood, and that he is highly sociopathic. And because that doctor held their determination as True, from that point onward, he was unable to see anything clearly, and was acting upon a delusion from his own mind. And that delusion harmed the woman who had come to see him, and worsened her dopamine deficiency-based state of suffering.

Normally, when people act on hallucination and are dangerous to other people, they are sometimes locked up and put under observation. Shouldn't doctors be locking themselves up, since their entire ideology is a sociopathic delusion that has harmed, and is continuing to harm many millions of people? By not locking themselves up, to keep the public safe from them and the falsehoods they peddle, they are adding to their hypocrisy.

P.S. - psychology, psychoanalysis, tends to be drivel, but what I speak from shares the same exactness as mathematics, and is why mathematics bears truthful statements. If a doctor imposes a determination which they then consider off of as if it were True, they have formed, and are actively engaging sociopathic connectivity in their brain. And any efforts made though exertion of that falsified ordering of considerations will bear the falsehoods of that circuit passed on in their results. And everything traces back to where it originated, down to the very consideration, its evaluation, and all that made up its environment, including all the furthest reaches of existence.



iv.

Having started this blog due to what I discovered concerning my own severe health ailments, and their successful resolutions, after having spent many, many years as a victim of far too many doctors and specialists, I can state confirmation, that what the woman who wrote the linked-to article described about her experience with a doctor is normal, and that the caring of many, perhaps most doctors is so conditional and superficial that, often, all semblance of it quickly vanishes the moment anything about the doctor's own environment of personal comfort, which is their practice, their feeling of authority, their belief in a dogma, is put to test, even benignly. And the moment that happens, many, many doctors will abuse their position to inflict intimidation, condescension, or spite, even in ways that they fully know can or certainly will be physically or otherwise severely detrimental to a patient. Though there are exceptions, I believe that this describes the temperament of the average doctor, and that their self-assuredness does not come from actually knowing anything, but from the appearance of authority presented by their granfalloon, that they are giving themselves to.

But, when a doctor's caring for patients only exists within the pre-fulfilled context of their personal wants being pandered to, with their title, reputation, office, authority, salary, an easy access to drugs they prevent other people from accessing (depending on where in the world, a doctor is not allowed to write themselves prescriptions. But, a great number of doctors, including ones who are hard-line against writing opioid and stimulant prescriptions to patients, give themselves special prescriptions of these kinds by writing them using names of their family members, that they then pick up themselves, for their own use. Also, there are doctors who write each other friendly bonus prescriptions, thinking as if their special educations make them super-duper good for it), yet they aren't willing to consider anything that puts any of those things at risk, it means that they aren't genuinely caring about other people, but just themselves.



v.

When I read the woman's experience, I am filled with reminder of the awareness that what the doctor aggressively opposes for someone who is most desperately needing of it for her proper, natural health and well-being, has been the foundation for everything that the doctor, with great arrogance, seeks for himself, even through his lecturing of the woman in service of his dogmatic suppositions.

But the difference between the doctor and the woman's pursuit of the same dopamine is that the woman legitimately needed it, and was rightful in acknowledging that and pursuing it, whereas the doctor already had an abundance of it, stored up through the much less legitimate means of circumventing truthful consideration with his determinations. And perhaps he greedily sought more of it by way of congratulating himself for being a good dog by enforcing what is a false and evil ideology, all at the expense of a woman who was suffering specifically because she lacks in availability of that same dopamine - which, for the doctor, doesn't become more available from doing anything right or wrong, good or bad, but from believing to himself that he is now a good dog, resolving any prior considering of the situation and freeing up the dopamine that was being used to connect information required for the sake of that considering.



vi.

I hope that it has become clear to all who read this blog that what a doctor, scientist, or anybody has been justifying as their dopaminergic "reward", their self-pandering entitlement, and their right to feel superior because of their learnedness has actually been nothing more than their colossal inhumane, arrogant stupidity, and selfish bias.

Those who believe 'dopamine as reward' have defined goodness as whatever serves their own personal comfort and bias. Many doctors practice medicine on people because doing so means to them that they've now fulfilled the picture of what is good, and can feel as though they've done their bit, resolving considering in their brain, which delivers them "reward" - and not because they consider the people who have need for help, that they might become empathetic of them. But it is not an action that makes somebody justified or non-justified, but the reason why it was done, with account given for all considerations.

There is a difference between doing what is determined as good because is serves personal reward, and doing what is truly good because to do so is the truth, and so that goodness will be. The former can never be truly good, and the difference is known in the truth.



vii.

In the case of the woman who wrote the article, the doctor who abused her exacerbated her dopamine deficiency by presenting trouble, and non-truthful consideration by his words and attitude, which the woman's brain then had to consider the truth of in the light of a better belief, in order to overcome - and the work of a brain, which is considering, requires dopamine.

"Satan" means 'one who opposes', and this doctor was a satan to this woman, her health, and the truth. But, despite the evils of doctors and their doctrine, look at the final sentence the woman wrote for her article, and notice that she's found the perfect truth, and that the light of the truth has shone through her experience and words:

"I do not have an addiction. I do not have a problem with prescription drugs... I have a solution."

The publishing of her article shows that she did indeed overcome the stress inflicted upon her by the doctor - thanks, in part, to the increase in dopamine-availability that her Percocet provided her with.
But also because she didn't accept the harmful determinations the sociopath doctor imposed upon her, but instead considered her own experience, and had faith in the truth of the matter, which her own experiences taught her.

I think that it is time for society as a whole to overcome the harms and evil of self-"reward"ing doctors, scientists, and their false dogma.

Shrapnel

Further Information on "Addiction" and Drug-Associated Health Issues, and the Environment That Produces Them

i.

Anything less than True is False, and so it is in a mind, where concepts are made of considerations, which each have a polarity. For a concept to evaluate as True, all its considerations must unify into a True altogether. And if just one of a concept's considerations is aligned against the whole picture, and evaluating as True against that picture, then that entire concept evaluates as False.

If a consideration is aligned against the understanding that what a person does is OK, then that contrarily-aligned consideration is feeding a streaming +1 value against the person's confidence and security, which is a continual +(-1) being imparted upon their  wholeness. This progressively splits the person's mind with growing uncertainty, doubt, anxiety, which can lead to fear, and panic.

And when a person has taken a drug that accelerates the pace at which their mind works, then the descent into internal suffering is all the worse.



ii.

But be sure to make full note that this is not caused by the drug itself, and is a poisonous seed that was sewn in their minds by anti-drug messaging, and messaging of non-acceptance or non-approval for doing such things. The reality will still be that the dopamine which they seek from the drugs they take is still what their brain runs on, and what is needed to make the difference between their suffering and their well-being.

And then those who sowed that harmful self-doubting considering within the people who experience it purport to treat and "help" them, all the while profiting monetarily and reputation-wise off the states that they, and those of their professions before them created, and maintain in society. And then those people further "reward" themselves by fulfilling their determinations for what makes them personally a good dog, contributing to an ideology that is false, and their reward is a release of the same dopamine in their already over-dopamined brains as that which they work to prevent from being increased in the brains of those who need it most.



iii.

The choice to employ social engineering against people who engaged in drug use, which ostracized them and caused all the problems the institution then presents itself as being needed to look after was not done out of caring for the people who were being harmed, and a doctor who employs the institution's teaching does not firstly, and therefore genuinely care about the people they practice those teachings upon. But they are charlatans, who do the things they do, not with the truth, compassion and care for another person as their leading consideration, but because of what I've written in the post A Treatise of Existence, part 2:

When a person makes a determination, they align considerations against one another within their own mind, because of Reason, and the amount of space within their mind that they are able to exist in at any one given time, and have evaluate as True, is reduced, while at the same time, the number of considerations they experience as opposing what they’ve determined to be True increases.

Also, as a person increases the volume of consideration value within their mind that is negative, relative to their determinations, they will feel incomplete unless something fills that negative consideration value, something that they can label and target, and use to define themselves as good by defining good within themselves as being ‘not that,’ contrasting themselves against those things (for example, a physician often fills their negative consideration-value with determined concepts of people who use dopaminergics as having problems that need institutional defining and direction, and simultaneously define themselves as good for not being like this, and so are deserving of their determined concept of "reward," which is the same dopamine, only gained through false-pretenses).



iv.

All things are made of considerations, and whereas a person may do something and physical trace is no longer apparent afterwards, it is not the same with consideration. Everything is delivering consideration to everything else, and all consideration is accounted for in the truth. The consideration of what was done regarding these things remains, lingering in society, and its negative consideration value is tremendous. And here is what has been done:

Government, scientists, and doctors have spent decades disseminating false research and prolific messaging that instils uncertainty, nervousness, doubt, fear, feelings of non-acceptable drug usage, which causes mental agitation, divides a mind, and negative considering when a person takes drugs.  Then they work to convince people that they have a problem, when convincing them of such is the root cause of behaviour that is problematic. Then they use the expression of those things that were artificially put into people and society as justification for doing those things to people with their messaging and ostracization in the first place. They then feed institutions and "professionals" (who are charlatans that don't actually know anything truthful) who profit both monetarily and reputation-wise for "helping" people with the problems they and their institutions created.



v.

Further, because anything less than True is False, by imposing ideological determinations upon people who use drugs, that might convince them that there is a problem, that something is not fully right, that they would be better otherwise, they cause consideration towards the state of full well-being within the person to be aligned against their own state of full well-being, so long as they don't modify their behaviour, and in doing so, they not only create, but they lock-in, as perpetual, the person's state of feeling want and need.

And for those who they successfully convince of their determinations, to conform to them, who do so only to feel more accepted, such as the institution of Alcoholics Anonymous, are left in a state of perpetual imprisonment, not allowed to overcome that consideration that keeps them out of full-being. And because those people have accepted the determinations which are aligned against the thoughts and behaviour of allowing drug use, those people have accepted a prejudice into themselves. And these people are examples of who Jesus spoke of when he said to the Pharisees of his day:

"Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over land and sea to win a single convert, and when you have succeeded, you make them twice as much a child of hell as you are."



vi.

What is considered into a person become digested by their mind, and a part of their feeling and being. And just as with raising a child, a parent has the option of telling things which deliver positive consideration and build a child up and give them strength of character, or deliver discouraging and abusive consideration, which leads to all problems inside of the person, it is the same with adults: Truthful and constructive messaging will build an adult person, while antagonistic, demoralizing consideration will wear an adult person down until they are defeated.

Institutional medicine, government, doctors, scientists have chosen, for decades, to degrade, demoralize, deceive, to instil fear, worry, and doubt into people who use drugs, and to ostracize them for using drugs. If they had seen those people as equal and valuable, then they would have considered them as being equal and valuable. And if they had chosen to consider the person as equal and valuable, and delivered the messaging that affirms a person's right to choose, and to have confidence in their choice, then none of the problems associated which drug use would exist, because those problems are not caused by drug use at all, but by society's chosen reaction and attitude towards it.

It is exactly as written at the end of this article:

"It may well be that prohibition, and distribution of drugs by criminals, gives worse results for the outcomes we think are important, such as harm to the user and to communities through crime. But equally, we may tolerate these outcomes, because we decide it is more important that we declare ourselves to disapprove of drug use."

And it is because government, scientists, doctors chose to deny a person's right to choose over their own body, instead imposing their ideology upon people's bodies and minds, that they are equal to rapists: Because the effects of a person imposing their will upon another bears will always bear the same detrimental meaning upon the considerations of a person's mind, and that detrimental influence is the identity of rape. Do not judge by outside appearance, but judge only once having considered all things truthfully. And remember that I've said that the truth is one consideration giving itself to another with neither force nor resistance.

And all that people who practice rape as their profession have accrued for themselves in property and reputation is ill-gained, and stolen from those whose lives were raped by the messaging that was determined and imposed upon them. And this is the judgement that stands against those who did these things to other people: all the attributed ills of a drug-user's affliction are the debt owed by those who refused to choose a more considerate message to give to those people.



vii.

And beware of the behaviour that I described earlier:

Government, scientists, and doctors have spent decades disseminating false research and prolific messaging that instils uncertainty, nervousness, doubt, fear, feelings of non-acceptable drug usage, which causes mental agitation, divides a mind, and negative considering when a person takes drugs.  Then they work to convince people that they have a problem, when convincing them of such is the root cause of behaviour that is problematic. Then they use the expression of those things that were artificially put into people and society as justification for doing those things to people with their messaging and ostracization in the first place. They then feed institutions and "professionals" (who are charlatans that don't actually know anything truthful) who profit both monetarily and reputation-wise for "helping" people with the problems they and their institutions created.

Because this is typical behaviour of sociopaths: They make determinations to give themselves leverage.

A determination is a falsehood by nature, which says, 'these considerations and not these others', falsely strengthening some connections between considerations while simultaneously falsely weakening others, polarizing and biasing an environment of considerations.

Aligning some consideration against others creates a sense of absence for many considerations and those who share them, which is a perpetual need that does not heal unless the image of truth is restored. And so, for as long as that wound in the truth is prevented from becoming healed, it is an opportunity for those who made and perpetuate it to capitalise on the need, the suffering, and the confusion of those considerations which were attacked and abandoned. So, they impose a falsehood, which creates suffering and sense of need, and then they exploit the situation for their own personal gain.

And this behaviour is what institutional medicine is comprehensively about: Where governments whose pre-determined goal is to produce conclusions which support their drug-prohibition policies are also who license and regulate drug research (which establishes the doctrine from professional practice to academic study), where the companies that choose and fund the research that seeks and receives licenses are 'in the business of shareholder profit, not helping the sick,' where those scientists who carry out the selected, funded, and licensed research, and who produce its conclusions are "reward"-motivated to count-as-confirmed every bias which makes their employer more money and which gains them more recognition, control, and dopamine-availability increase, ... and where those who employ and enforce the narrative chosen by the former three groups have “reward” (increasing their personal dopamine-availability) as their primary motivation, and where those doctors, specialists, etc, have determined that “reward” within themselves to come from contributing to the doctrine that is a murderous lie.


As I've said before, Science, which is the practice of making determinations upon observation, is a method of falsification, and which is a tool of sociopaths, and which instils further sociopathism within a person's mind, and within society.


All the while, the truth is that mental stress, depression, anxiety, psychosis, ADHD, PTSD, autism, bi-polar, schizophrenia, alzheimer’s, parkinson’s, and a lot more, are all only caused by insufficient dopamine-availability in a person relative to the amount of work their brain is attempting, or being forced to consider, and that all of these ailments are completely preventable (and most of them fully curable) by taking cocaine in the right manner. Also also that cocaine, and other criminalized dopaminergics are far healthier and well-being producing that anything that exists within a doctor’s arsenal of effectiveness-reduced, side-effects increased, ailment locking-in pharmaceuticals, and that the real reason why cocaine is prohibited by an echelon of sociopaths from confident use in society, is this:

Because it proficiently works to prevent ailments, to heal ones that exist, to increase mental fortitude and acuity, making its absence seem too great a tool for societal and capitalistic leverage.



Related posts:

Where Does A "Drug-Induced" Psychosis Really Come From?
How Belief Affects Mental Stress Treatment, and the Effect that Anti-Drug Propaganda Has on Mental Health

Shrapnel

A Simple Truth About "Addiction" Drug Use, and Trauma

Article: Trauma is the root cause of addiction, according to Dr. Gabor Mate


The human brain runs on dopamine, which is what most drug users are seeking from substances such as meth, cocaine, and a plethora of others. When a brain is under stress, its availability of dopamine is diminished beyond what is required to properly handle the workload presented to it, and that leads to physical discomfort, lethargy, sometimes agitation, and a lot more negative effects. This can, in turn lead to a person seeking substances which increase their dopamine to levels which simply enable them to feel normal, like the common person - though the person with dopamine deficiency interprets that state as much better than normal, because, to them, it is, and they don't realize their normal is actually much worse than what is normal to other people, and other "normal" people also don't recognize this. But when they are without enough dopamine availability, everything about their body will function less, they will have less mental acuity, less energy to think and act with, etc.

This is also a big part of why people who have experienced trauma, which is a whole lot of work for a brain to get through, often end up using drugs. Also, conversely, why people with substance use problems so often have experienced trauma.

Trauma is simply an extreme amount of considering work that is presented to a brain, which requires a ton of dopamine to handle and overcome the non-considered state of. And when it is fully considered, the person is no longer affected by the trauma, and the workload is resolved. The consideration that made for the trauma has been digested, and its considerations are accounted for in their positive placements within the new state of that person's mind.

I have previously said that PTSD can be permanently cured in a person who has it by taking cocaine (and tending to all the other considerations I've mentioned), and this is true.



When a person seeks drugs to make them feel better, while in a long-term depression or other troubles, they are on the right path - because sufficient dopamine availability will be required for them to consider the difference between the state they're in, and their fully healed state. But so often, a person who does pursue their health in this manner then takes on additional feelings of guilt, worries about money, and social ostracization because of their simply tending to their brain's healthy need, and all these worrying considerations passively create more work for their brain, which then puts a drag on their dopamine availability, hindering their healing potential, and often keeping them completely locked out of making the progress within their mind that will eventually, when all things are considered, lead them to becoming fully healed

If not for the negative and worrying messaging cultivated by anti-drug interests, people would not become locked into harmful drug habits, and wouldn't experience the adverse psychological reactions that are often associated with drug usage, but the origins of which are not drugs at all, but the imposed negative conditioning by those who have ideologically opposed a person's right to choose concerning their own body.



Also, often, people around a person who uses drugs due to dopamine deficiency interprets the dopamine deficient state of that person as them not caring, and they use this assessment to write that person off, or to act in ways towards them that worsens that person's dopamine availability, and so makes that person need to increase their dopamine even more to feel OK and to be able to function properly. But what a lot of people might presume is not caring, judging from an outsider's observation, is merely an insufficient amount of available dopamine within the person's brain form them to be able to piece information together at a normal rate, for them to be able to respond normally, to have decisive thoughts, and to give them energy to act with.

If a person wishes to overcome a drug-use that they either don't want, or are made to not feel happy and accepted about, the very first thing for them to learn is that it's OK for them to use drugs, whichever drug they decide to use, and according to their discretion... and it always was. Unless a person believes that within themselves, their lack of acceptance of this will be locking their need for increasing their dopamine into place, and creating this artificial and disparate branch of considerations that was determined and imposed upon them, called "addiction."



It is clarifying of the truth behind Gabor Mate's perception to say that insufficient dopamine-availability relative to the increased workload that trauma creates for a brain is the cause of people engaging in dopamine-increasing behaviours. And those people seeking to increase their dopamine to deal with stress have been exactly right all along.



Related posts:

The Reality Behind 'Chasing the Dragon'
Where Does A "Drug-Induced" Psychosis Really Come From?
How Belief Affects Mental Stress Treatment, and the Effect that Anti-Drug Propaganda Has on Mental Health
Further Information on "Addiction" and Drug-Associated Health Issues, and the Environment that Produces them
Article: "Percocet Ruins Lives", But It Saved This Woman's
Articles: 'Belief concerning nicotine drives behaviour and dopamine availability' & The Experience of Considering

Shrapnel

How Belief Affects Mental Stress Treatment, and the Effect that Anti-Drug Propaganda Has on Mental Health

i.

One of the most important things for a person who want to treat their mental stress ailment with cocaine, or similar, is that they believe that doing so is perfectly OK, and good to do.
As I've said many times, a consideration is polar. And it is because considerations are polar that Meaning exists. And so, whenever a person engages consideration, they're being led forward.
But when a person moves by determination, they don't progress in the truth.

So, if a person holds a negative belief inside of themselves, a belief being a declaration of 'This Is' to their mind, to which Reason then applies, then that person has False, and hostile-to-truth things considering in their mind, and they accumulate negative consideration value, which reacts in anti-polar fashion to what is good.

And if a person holds a negative and non-accepting belief concerning the action they engage in, then their own choices and lingering actions against their own acceptance of what is allowed causes a judgement against their own actions to evaluate True within their mind, substantiated by their own considerations as aligned according to their deeper belief, and causing their own considerations to turn in their polarity, against them. And they may accrue guilt, and feelings of non-acceptance by what is right, whatever their belief of what is right may be.

If a person continues to engage in what they have believed is wrong, then the amount of consideration which judged them grows, and the amount of consideration which they feel safe within lessens. And this is the cause of all drug-induced psychosis, as I mentioned in this previous blog post: Where Does A "Drug-Induced" Psychosis Really Come From?

If a person had no doubts concerning their choice and activity, then there could be nothing to cause an increase of worry, panic, and fear, within them.

But even if a person doesn't feel right using cocaine, or increasing their dopamine to cure their ailment, this is still the truth: The human brain runs on the effect of cocaine, and all mental stress ailment is only caused by there being insufficient availability of the effect of cocaine within their brain, relative to the amount of work that their brain is engaged with.


ii. 

But where has this highly-detrimental belief within society, concerning the very thing the human brain runs on and engagement of what truthfully prevents mental stress and cures a person of their mental stress states, come from?

Those things have been painstakingly cultivated by governments, by institutional medicine, by scientists, and by doctors and specialists. And when a government has run a sentiment-based fear campaign against drugs, there has always been a large increase in negative influence in society, an increase of vulnerability to issues which cannot be caused by drugs alone, but only if a person has been convinced that the action they engage in anyway is wrongful. All the same mental health issues would ensue if a person, or people were convinced that drinking water made them wrong and unaccepted, yet they drank anyway because they needed to, and their own body informed them of it.

Yet, in the case of anti-drug propaganda, the thing which people in society have been brainwashed to feel uncertain about is the very cure for the mental stress states that arise from having a doubting and uncertain mind. Government, scientists, and doctors, have made people fear their own state of becoming and being healthy, the basic state of being human.

So, if a person wants to be healed of their affliction, it is important that they first understand, and believe within themselves, that taking drugs, and especially cocaine, is perfectly OK, and good for their health. Its effect is what their body was designed by nature to run on, and literally needs to overcome, to develop, and to heal.

And, as I’ve said previously, it will come to be understood that all the harms associated with drug use were caused only by the determined opposition to them by institutional medicine and those who practice it. But drugs on their own do not cause these things, and any activity that a person is uncertain about, but does anyway, will equally be a threat to their mental well-being.

iii.

The apostle Paul spoke from this understanding when he said "For instance, one person believes it's all right to eat anything. But another believer with a sensitive conscience will eat only vegetables."

And again, Paul spoke from this understanding when he said, "'Everything is permissible,' but not everything is beneficial. 'Everything is permissible,' but not everything is edifying."

And when government, scientists, and doctors disseminated falsehoods and insisted determinations upon people in society concerning what drug use is, they were those Jesus spoke of in this parable:

"The kingdom of heaven is like a man who sowed good seed in his field. But while everyone was sleeping, his enemy came and sowed weeds among the wheat, and went away.

When the wheat sprouted and formed heads, then the weeds also appeared. "The owner's servants came to him and said, 'Sir, didn't you sow good seed in your field? Where then did the weeds come from?' "'An enemy did this,' he replied. "The servants asked him, 'Do you want us to go and pull them up?' "'No,' he answered, 'because while you are pulling the weeds, you may uproot the wheat with them. Let both grow together until the harvest. At that time I will tell the harvesters: First collect the weeds and tie them in bundles to be burned; then gather the wheat and bring it into my barn.'"

The seeds of the enemy are the determinations of government, scientists, and doctors, made for the purpose of creating self-benefiting leverage in society, enforcing their ideology, giving their prejudice a target, and providing themselves with a sense of "reward."

Those determinations have produced much harmful considering in many of the most vulnerable people in society, and the mental stress ailments in society today are the weeds grown from the harmful considering that sprouted from the seeds of institutional and government-run medicine.

And the produced consideration that deepens the articulation and fine perception of a mind, allowing a person to finally understand this situation, is the fruit of the good seed, which was to be protected while the weeds were let to grow alongside. And now is the time to gather the weeds into bundles to be burned, so that only what is good may remain standing.

iv.

The false, determination-based and sentiment-driven philosophy that doctors, scientists and government rely on for dissemination their objectives concerning drug-use in society, when accepted as True by people, leads a person's consideration into all the harms which have been falsely attributed to drug-use that can be witnessed in society today, because that philosophy is not born of the consideration that brings the truth.

And as Jesus warned those he taught the truth to, to "Watch out and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees." The leaven, which causes dough to rise, is the considering caused by an accepted belief. When what has become accepted as True is bad, so is what rises from it. The same warning applies today, regarding the leaven of doctors, scientists, and government, which causes mental stress ailment, inequality, prejudice, and much suffering to rise within society.

As Jesus said, "A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit." And also, "Make a tree good and its fruit will be good, or make a tree bad and its fruit will be bad, for a tree is recognized by its fruit."

The tree Jesus spoke of is the structure of consideration which forms by a person's belief. It grows, and has branches, just like the neural network in a person's brain grown and develops branches according to a person's belief, because belief is a declaration of 'This Is', to which Reason then applies, causing considering, which is the source of all development, including human evolution.

What is the judgment of a tree which has not produced understanding and good results for the last 100 years (the very same length of time since cocaine became restricted from medical use), and the fruit of which has been the continuation, and entrenching of mental stress ailments in society?

As Jesus said, "Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire." And so it is time to cut down the False-bearing tree of institutional medicine.

v.

As the apostle Paul also said, "Those who feel free to eat anything must not look down on those who don't. And those who don't eat certain foods must not condemn those who do, for God has accepted them."

The same must apply, and does, regarding those who choose to use drugs, and those that don't: That they must not be ostracized by society for their choices concerning what they put into their own bodies in accordance with their belief, and they must not ostracize others for their choices concerning what they put into their own bodies in accordance with their own belief.

And there must not be efforts to manipulate the outcomes of any such use by those who choose to engage it.

Related post: A Few More for: An Eclectic Assortment of Articles

Shrapnel

Article: Study suggests laziness is related to high intelligence (& curing a psychosis)

Article: Study suggests laziness is related to high intelligence


The other side to this, is that the more work a brain is doing, the bigger the drain on dopamine-availability, and dopamine-availability is the source for a person's energy. A person with lower dopamine will become lethargic, and every action they make will require more effort than a person who has higher dopamine available to them.

A person who does not do much considering is not taxing their brain's dopamine-availability, and consequently has more available dopamine to be used to direct things like physical movement, which is produced by signals considering through a brain, just like creative thought, although it is a much less intensive form of work for a brain.

Related to this study's recognition is what I talked about in this much earlier blog post:
Correction of a Dopamine Study's Conclusion on Willingness to Work vs Regional Dopamine

Also, this matter is the very same subject as why highly creatively-talented people so often struggle with mental disorders.



ii.

Also, as considerations are polar, and considering cannot be stopped unless it is resolved somehow, either by considering a truth to its completion, or by falsifying its resolution via a determination, and as making a determination itself, even though it ends up freeing up more dopamine, requires a larger amount of dopamine to enact than does continuing considering, people who have engaged consideration of many things often cannot get out of the considering of their own will, because they no longer have enough dopamine available to apply a concept as true that engages all their active considerations simultaneously and and gives them reason to no longer consider.

Also, this is why dopamine-deficiency states like Autism are so vulnerable to environmental stimulation: The environment is causing considering in the sufferer's brain which they don't have dopamine enough to control, or to stop, and so the signals are being pulled through their brain with force, and causing great pain, exhaustion, and confusion.


However, if anyone who does not have enough dopamine-availability to take full control over their brain only increase their dopamine-availability (while restraining other effects, like adrenergic influence), this becomes much more easy to do.

For example: If a person is experiencing painful considering that they can't get ahold of, such as in the case of a psychosis, and they, after doing the best to relax their mind as much as possible, then take a large amount of 100% pure cocaine, and just be idle, all the many different things that are considering in their brain will start catching one another, and they'll start assembling into bigger pictures which then resolve, and the person will be completely lifted right out of their psychosis, into their fully-cured state. With 100% pure cocaine, this can be done in 30 minutes - 2 hours, reliably, if all the other things which I've said to accommodate are also regarded - some of those things are included in these past posts:

Basic Framework for the Personal Addressing of Mental Stress to Treat and Cure its Ailments
A Crash-Course in the Basics for Truth-Based Human Health Treatment


I can go into further detail about this, but what's first important to know is that is that institutional doctrine concerning mental stress ailments, dopamine, and criminalized substances such as cocaine, or methamphetamine, is a deliberate work of fiction, designed to steer all considering away from reaching the truth of the matters of mental-stress ailments, their authentic cure, and also the same regarding the truth of general human physiology, human confidence and success.

Even if those who practice it are unwitting of it, institutional medicine's teaching is to maintain profits and a societal leverage, but is entirely contradictory to the truth. So, a person cannot do what's right and truth-based while also adhering to an institution's doctrine - it is impossible, since the two are aligned towards completely obtuse ends.



iii.

But if all the other things I've said about mental relaxation and preparation before doing something with a dopaminergic substance are not regarded, then it is possible to make an ailing situation worse, because a person's experience within their brain is like an internal-combustion engine, where the person's own controlled activity is the spark at the top of the piston's cycle, and each time a person does anything with their mind, they cause the spark-plug to fire, which propels the cylinder to go for another cycle, and complete another cycle of work.

The choice of the person is whether to do anything the next time that piston reaches up to it with the consideration it has gained in its travel through a cycle, or whether to be still and let it pass by without engaging it. A person can become locked in engaging that piston as it reaches up to them for potential input, once the work that is being carried in the cycle holds a greater True evaluation within it than the person's own self-belief, as then their own control will evaluate False against the carried True determination of the work.


If a person doesn't do anything with that work, neither rejecting it, making a determination upon it, or modifying it, and they open the pathway of their own choice to let it pass through, it will progressively consider in the gentle belief of the whole being True (the considerations of that work and the person allowing it to be considered), until all the work's involved considerations are routed where they belong to fulfill the picture of that full True.

But if a person doesn't have enough dopamine-availability to control their own composure as this happens, each cycle of work can force a determination upon the person's own control over themselves, and the state can become worse, or be a long-lasting affliction.

But what's different between a human's brain and an internal-combustion engine, is that, while an internal-combustion engine has the one spark-plug at the top of a work-cycle, which propels the cylinder all the way around its route of travel, in a brain, there are many spark-plugs, and the person who controls their body is just one of many considerations which each have their own Yes or No choice to make regarding the things that consider through them. All those other considerations with a person's brain are living, and they experience just as the person with their full forefront consciousness does.

But the hope of all the considerations in a body is to fulfill the full person, so that all may reason into one full human, and they do whatever they see as leading towards the greatest truth (and so they obey a person's belief). When a person's belief is influenced by fear, they informs those considerations in a manner which will reciprocate the pain and division of that fear back to the leading consideration. It is entirely possible for relations between considerations in a body to break, whether accidental or not, and for their True evaluations to become antagonist towards one another.

But by increasing dopamine, and through gentle considering, all discrepancies can be resolved, and an ailing state can be healed.

A person should not ever fight with their considerations, but learn to consider them, which is what they wish. And any opposition by a person towards their own considerations will cause those considerations to reflect that antagonistic belief back to the person who is the leading consideration, and worsen the internal state of that mind and body, overall.

Shrapnel

A link I should've added to the previous post regarding Autism, ADHD, OCD

Here's a link to an earlier blog post that would have been relevant to add to the opening sentence in the previous post (Article: Common brain signature marks autism, attention deficit):
 Dopamine Deficient Signal Routing Causing Affliction in Cases of Autism, OCD, ADD / ADHD...

Also, if you are a doctor or scientist working on these, please bear with my expressions, and keep up the good work.

Shrapnel

Article: Common brain signature marks autism, attention deficit

Article: Common brain signature marks autism, attention deficit



i.

Wow, who would've seen that coming, Autism, ADHD, and OCD all demonstrating the same pattern in having a disruption in the development of connections?

Maybe that development is produced via the brain's work, which is considering, and considering for any process in the brain is dependent upon the same resource, and if that resource isn't plentiful enough, then maybe that development is interrupted.

Also, notice that the article mentions impulsiveness to be present in all these instances. Impulsiveness is already a trait of having stunted consideration development due to a willful lack of consideration. But now sociopaths, by their edicts, are offloading their sociopathic traits onto others, falsely infecting them, by forcefully opposing those people's brains' natural efforts to develop the very best they can, by way of restricting those brains' access to the greater dopamine their brain's literally need to be healthy and work as designed by God and evolution.



ii.

A quote from the article says, “A reasonable conclusion is that autism and ADHD don’t differ dramatically in a structural way, but could differ in connectivity”

Hmm, very interesting, mhm mhm....

So, anyway, the fully-reasoned conclusion is that the difference between these types of cases is only which development processes were first impacted by the dopamine deficiency, due to many smaller factors concerning how much of what type of work a brain is trying to accomplish at a particular time. But, they were all caused by dopamine deficiency.

If a pregnant parent wishes to do the most they can to prevent these thing in their child, then taking 100% pure cocaine, while being mindful of the other considerations I've provided is the very best thing to do for the child's health, their positive and good development, and even for the mother, herself.


The article also says "Autism shares genetic roots with obsessive-compulsive disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder." I've said that genes are the output of considering, and considering is the work of the brain for which dopamine is required. If there isn't dopamine to properly consider, which is the brain's processing, then the considering process is impaired, and the output of the considering process will reflect that impairment.


iii.

There is much more I could say on this, but when every instance of these ailments easily and quickly resolves from the same source basic understanding, I have to wonder, why is it of value to hear the same and similar words said over and over again, to produce the same clarity each next instance of the same thing?

Also, the anger I feel reading these article is heavily impacting on my own dopamine availability, and that anger chokes out my ability to say all the things that would conclude the matter once and for all for everyone on Earth today. Yet, I still know them all, and will speak them when I feel good to.



iv.

A very dire truth is that no-one has contributed more to suffering an inequality in the modern world than the doctors and scientists who work to further and shield the fictional narrative of dopamine and dopaminergics, which has been the greatest ethical, moral, and institutional failure in modern humanity's history. Although, the institutional failure part shouldn't even be a thing, because the institution, the granfalloon, is the failure, along with the sociopathism in those who seek to create and enforce such institutions to falsify a personal leverage in society and self-gratifying sense of "reward."



v.

I would presume that a lot of the medical professionals who read this blog don't like it when I write pointed accusations at them, since viewer numbers have always dropped off a steep cliff following such statement since the beginning of the blog, but so what? They're professional murderers and thieves of people's lives, and bringers of suffering to those around the people their doctrine steals the life from. Their entire ideology has been a harmful and indefensible lie, and they've been its advocates. If those whose lives, minds, and dreams have been taken or restrained because of their choices haven't been protected, and neither have been those who truthfully spoke their dopaminergic need, then why should be the egos of those who took those people's lives, minds, and dreams, and who prop up the most malicious and deceptive facade human society ever produced?

Do they condition their willingness to engage the truth upon first having their falseness accommodated and pandered to?



vi.

If those whose lives, minds, and dreams that were taken hadn't been put into the states they've been artificially put into, and if those people understood considering and the need to look after their dopamine availabilities, then they would be society's greatest minds, and no one who came before would be as anything in comparison to their capabilities. An Einstein, Tesla, or Da Vinci would be like childish thinkers, to them.

If one person who knows theses things is greater than millions who don't, and can accomplish in a single year a full understanding of the things that millions could only achieve falsehoods regarding given a full century, then it would certainly be as I've stated.

Remember, the more dopamine that is accessible to a brain, the more considerations that brain can work with at one time. That means that what is impossible to reach with low dopamine is easy to master with high dopamine. What takes a thousand years and still isn't fully graspable with little dopamine can take one minute with high dopamine, and be known in its entirety. But the other requirement to such mental proficiency is to have considerations within a brain considered in their truthful placements. A person with massive dopamine who makes determinations will not have the communication and access between their considerations needed to achieve greater truthful understanding.

And so doctors and scientists have offended the truth on two fronts: by obstructing access to dopamine, which is like obstructing access to water or air, and by continuously pressing a false understanding which prevents truthful consideration of matters, and which reduces society's capacity as a whole to consider matters truthfully.



vii.

As things stand, doctors and scientists, and government must already face the rest of society, and own up to the truth that they've been telling them what was exactly false concerning dopaminergic substances, drugs in general, their relevance to human health, and psychological understanding (which has so far only claimed justifications for the sociopathic mentalities of those who've developed it). Waiting longer to admit to the truth is not going to make the mountain of consideration that is required to be corrected lessen. But waiting will cause the number of people who suffer to grow.

Shrapnel

A Treatise of Existence, Part 2

When a person makes a determination, they align considerations against one another within their own mind, because of Reason, and the amount of space within their mind that they are able to exist in at any one given time, and have evaluate as True, is reduced, while at the same time, the number of considerations they experience as opposing what they’ve determined to be True increases.

Also, as a person increases the volume of consideration value within their mind that is negative, relative to their determinations, they will feel incomplete unless something fills that negative consideration value, something that they can label and target, and use to define themselves as good by defining good within themselves as being ‘not that,’ contrasting themselves against those things (for example, a physician often fills their negative consideration-value with determined concepts of people who use dopaminergics as having problems that need institutional defining and direction, and simultaneously define themselves as good for not being like this, and so are deserving of their determined concept of "reward," which is the same dopamine, only gained through false-pretenses).


In Reason there is all of Value, Meaning, Purpose, and Point, none of which are determined, but all of which simply Are. But a person who has falsified their mind by determinations is detached from all of these things except for Value, and often Value becomes their determined Meaning, Purpose, and Point, because they are no longer able to see and consider the things beyond.

And because such a person no longer naturally evaluate as True from within, due to their falsified consideration structure, they seek to align themselves to things outside of themselves, often around determinations shared with others, and they together create institutions, causes, carefully laid-out principles, organizations, ideals, pacts, all things which they think are what makes them good, as segmented conducts.


But because there is no truthful meaning to their determinations, the truthful consideration structure of the whole melts, while their determinations bind them to one another with the forceful pull of a black hole, and they become a granfalloon, which is a meaningless association of people, desperate to achieve a feeling of acceptance, purpose, and truthful placement by drawing in to their organization all those that they see outside of themselves as still having truthful meaning within themselves, thinking that doing so will increase the meaning of their whole. Yet, each one who is drawn into them becomes as them, and in the end their whole mass feels even more empty than before.

With enough dismantling of truth in a person’s mind though the making of determinations, what results is a consideration structure that is still made up of True and False, but that is no longer grounded in anything fully True. And without being grounded in anything fully True, that consideration structure isn’t stationary, but shifts, while retaining its form, to maintain its relative disposition amongst its considerations as the person who exists by it moves their determination of what is in order to suit their current experience. Such a person is transient in their principles, and move to wherever they feel the greatest sense of approving authority, of power, which is the accumulation Value that has become sclerosised around determinations.



In a perfectly-reasoned mind, the whole evaluates as one. And where there may be 12 considerations, each with their own +1 value evaluation to give to something (which is an evaluation of True to wherever they choose to give it), and all being considered perfectly into the truth and reasoned into one being, they become one mind and they all share the awareness of all and have the value of all, with their greater form again evaluating as one. But their shared identity as one is greater than the collection of all their individual values. Their state of perfectly-reasoned oneness fully exists within themselves, and is the light and multi-faceted dimension of all And each consideration of that reason now has greater authority and power than all less-tier considerations. While on their own, not yet within reason, every consideration experiences loneliness, and relative darkness.

When a determination is made, it declares 'these considerations, but not these others,' introducing falsehood into a consideration structure, and invalidating the presence of the truth, weakening and even breaking a truthful consideration structure, which will have lost its reason. And the point of falsification that was the determination, has no truthful Meaning, Purpose, and Point, but receives multiple lesser consideration-values of +1 pointing towards its point of falsification, which is an abyss. To a sociopath, who judges by making determinations based on appearance, and not from having considered all things truthfully and having the truth present itself to them, the appearance of +5, or +9, or any other number of lesser-tier considerations, pointing towards a determined cause, is presumed to have more authority than the perfectly-reasoned truth, which simply Is, and which all lesser considerations receive their true value from.

Shrapnel