Article: Mental illness mostly caused by life events not genetics, argue psychologists

Article: Mental illness mostly caused by life events not genetics, argue psychologists


To be specific, there are two root causes of mental illness: socipathism, which is the lack of consideration of the truth, and mental stress, which is the lack of released dopamine to handle the workload of considering that a brain is trying to do. And so the mental illness indicated by that above linked-to article is caused by the impact that life events have on a person's dopamine availability. With sufficient dopamine availability, a person will be able to rise above every challenging event.

That overcoming is a brain considering the meaning of every consideration which is a part of the event which a person encountered. And having greater dopamine availability won't change the amount of work which is to be done, but will make every workload weigh less and be handled with greater ease, and in less discomfort.

And genes are outputs of considering, which is the work of a brain that requires dopamine to do, and which suffers when a brain hasn't enough dopamine availability to perform it - and that suffering is then expressed in all the outputs of the processes which had to work without sufficient dopamine. And it is the false doctrines of reward-seeking sociopaths that has created the influences in society which are to blame for the continued existence and prevalence of mental health issues.



It's incredible that however many people (scientists, doctors, psychologists, etc...) have spent 100 years accomplishing absolutely nothing but an endless wild-goose chase of their own preferred determining.

A bunch of dopamine-plentiful people determined that it was better that any number of dopamine deficient people be tortured their whole lives, in pain, unhappiness and despair, conceding experience and opportunity, endlessly enduring agonizing stress and anxiety... all of it just because the dopamine-plentiful people found it preferential to their own comfort and position in society. Those people have been no different than slave owners whose entire fortunes were built on the backs of exploitation of others, and who would not give up their slaves, but would forcefully argue against the abolition of slavery - and they are still doing it.

Keeping dopamine deficiency states in society lets doctors and their ilk pretend that they're deserving of their reputation, their incomes, their self-determined "rewards"... but none of it is true. They are the most dishonourable of people, and their whole state in life has been built upon a lie, fraud, the undetected genocide of innocents and the most vulnerable. Everything that any doctor has ever judged a drug user of being all applies to doctors, themselves: They are in denial of reality, they harm others in pursuit of their goal, their ideology is selfish and only serving of them, they steal from people (their very lives), they cheat people (of their very mind, good health, and again lives)... they are acting out a sociopathic fantasy, and like bumbling idiots pretending that they are anything at all representing good.



This is what a doctor really is the custodian of:
Nixon official: real reason for the drug war was to criminalize black people and hippies

All modern institutional approach to drugs and health treatment is rooted in false and contrived drug propaganda, and is, itself, propaganda. And when governments, whose prerogative has been to use scare tactics to keep people away from looking at criminalized substances objectively, controls drug research licensing, and when pharmaceutical companies, who make their profit from inferior medications, fund the drug research that's available while also lobbying governments, and when a doctor’s greatest qualification for their job is precisely that they have no experience but are dopamine-rich due to being little-considering, what do you think that the expectable outcome from drug research and application will be?

The lie has been too sweet for doctors to pass up. They tell themselves that they deserve the things which that lie promised them, having jumped through the hoops of medical school, having not engaged in all the things they made harsh and harmful judgements against others for doing... they tell themselves that their placement in the lie is their "reward" - and they seek that reward more than they seek to do good for others. That reward, by their own labelling, is a release of dopamine within their brains. And so, in the end, they've been nothing but crack addicts, leeching off society and doing it harm for the purpose of trying to instil as much sense of that "reward" inside of themselves as they can. And their determinations in pursuit of this shut shuts down their considering, leading there to be much dopamine to fuel their depravity. And their depravity is that they have turned a falsehood into trillion-dollar industries, and that their whole livelihoods are built upon the liquidation of the lives of others, under pretence of helping them.

As Jesus said, no person can serve two masters: Either they will love one and hate the other, or vice versa. This is the same as what I said: For all things there is an ordering of considerations. And the final consideration will flip the polarity of all those that came before it and did not acknowledge it. A person who is reward-oriented is not truth-oriented, and a person who serves their own reward will hate the truth, because the truth says that their self-determined reward doesn't exist in the truth: There is no reward for the truth - the truth is, and there is no other. And Reason will flip the polarity of the entire world so that the truth may present in it once again.

Shrapnel

ASMR Response is Dopamine / Understanding Dopamine’s Experience in a Body

ASMR stands for Autonomous sensory meridian response, and is the producing of brain and body tingles and relaxing sensations though auditory “triggers”. There are many YouTube channels dedicated to delivering this type of experience.

Not every person is immediately responsive to ASMR, just as how a thing is considered by a person changes what influence, if any, it will bear within them.

But for those people for whom ASMR is effective, when immersing in sounds and sensations that have considered since your earliest days as a human, to hold relaxing, calming, safety-reassuring, and intimate meaning, the recognition of those associations invokes Reason’s principle, and it relaxes processes within a person’s brain, freeing up potentially very significant amounts of dopamine (more than typical prescription medications will provide a person with).



Also, just like ASMR’s responses can be experienced throughout the body, not just in the head, it is likewise with dopamine’s release. I previously mentioned that an orgasm is entirely the experience of a small surge in dopamine being release in part of a brain, and I’ve also said that when high doses of cocaine are taken, that the same experience occurs throughout a person’s whole body. All the synapses in a brain correspond to something within the human body, and when a synapse becomes flooded with dopamine, the area which corresponds to it will feel good. For lack of having experience, most people may think that the feeling of an orgasm is something unique to sexuality – but this is not the case. That same experience will occur from any and every area and part of the human body, if dopamine is filled in the synapses which correspond to that area of the body.

The feeling of goodness caused by dopamine in a part of a body is also a positive comment on that area of the body, letting it know that it is ready and strongly supported for robust and accurate functionality, and that it has the means to do whatever it needs to, and that experience and knowing is shared throughout a person’s mind and body.

While having dopamine flood synapses which correspond to genitals might (or not, depending on a person’s consideration) provoke a person’s sexual interest, the same is not true regarding having dopamine flood synapses which correspond to non-sexual areas of their body. There is nothing specifically arousal-producing about dopamine, but dopamine is physio-fuel for all a brain’s work, and the more of it that is available to a synapse, the stronger, healthier, better-functioning, alive and awake the physiological processes which listen to that synapse will be. Dopamine really is life, and fullness of life-giving to the brain and body, and as such should be regarded as a first recourse in addressing and preventing health situations – because dopamine is, by natural and good design, a primary consideration to all a brain and body’s work, and everything else exists downstream and is conditional to having enough of it available. To not embrace dopamine is to be in resentment and loathing of one’s own state of being human, and spiting of one’s own better health.



A person who seeks the ASMR experience is seeking the same thing as a person who uses dopaminergics, and is also mostly getting the same thing as a person who uses dopaminergics like crack cocaine, or methamphetamine.

The positive therapeutic effects of ASMR are the positive therapeutic effects of increasing dopamine availability within a brain, and therefore the positive therapeutic effect of using cocaine. Though I would not say that it is equally the therapeutic effect of all dopaminergics, which typically allow adrenaline to increase alongside dopamine, because that adrenaline increase is antagonistic towards stress states, and makes for a very different experience, more challenged experience than dopamine’s increase all on its own.

If a person receives a strong effect from ASMR, then they can understand what cocaine feels like, knowing that experience for themselves, and being a partaker in that experience. Of course, by using cocaine, that experience can be made much greater, penetrate more deeply, and be more consistent, and work even with people who don’t react greatly to ASMR. Understanding this, a person who is familiar with strong ASMR responses should easily realize how positive cocaine use is for stress states, and for positively and successfully addressing various negative health states.

Shrapnel

A Crash-Course in the Basics for Truth-Based Human Health Treatment

Dopamine, serotonin, adrenaline, opioids, cannabinoid receptors, GHB receptors... from the day a human is born, even for one that's in their mother's womb, their brain is an ongoing drug bath. And all human experience and productivity are achieved and expressed through the manipulation of drug levels in a person's brain.

i.

Some most basic understanding that is essential for a person to be capable of compassionately and successfully treating people of their stress / dopamine deficiency ailments is as follows:

a)

Dopamine is the means by which a brain does all the work that is considering, which is the work by which a brain and its person develops, learns, memorizes, recalls, decides, etc, and is work that the rest of the body's health is subject to. A person's potential and successes are subject to their brain's access to released and available dopamine:

- Work is only possible for a person and brain in an environment of having enough dopamine for it, and dopamine levels are what form a person's head-room for their work potential: More dopamine equates to a greater work potential, while less dopamine equates to less work potential.

- The weight of any body of work, and the effort required for it from a particular person, is entirely relative to the amount of released dopamine which a person has within themselves: It is possible for something which has a work weight value of +5 to a person of high dopamine availability, to have a work weight value of +500, or greater, to a person of low dopamine availability.

- Lower dopamine means that a brain isn't able to connect as much information at one time, and must address work in piecemeal, rather than in its entirety at once, or using larger concepts.

- Lower dopamine exposes a person's brain and body to greater affliction by keeping the brain in a continuous state of trying to catch up on work, without allowing it reach resolution of work so that it could implement the meaning of its resolutions in ways which create solid foundations for the mental and physical environment, and fortify them against detected vulnerabilities.

- Also, lower dopamine means that a brain isn't able to access larger concepts, such as the concept of a particular objective. Concepts are formed by connecting considerations, and that connecting is reliant on dopamine availability. The more dopamine that can be allocated, the greater number of considerations can be held in positive connection, and worked with simultaneously.

This means that a person's capability to overcome matters, such as emotional, mental, and physical, is relative to the released and available dopamine which they have in their brain. What seems a straight-forward and easily doable matter to a dopamine-plentiful person can appear like an insurmountable mountain to a person with low dopamine availability. And what is easy and straight-forward for a person with lots of dopamine availability is extremely more difficult, and less certain, even impossible, for a person with notably less dopamine availability.


A lot of people with high dopamine availability misjudge their worth by basing their assessment on outward appearance of their accomplishments and productivity relative to the general populace, without ever being aware that many of the people they judge as least motivated, productive, and ambitious, are exerting greater than 50x the effort each day, while accomplishing very little, compared to many of the people who are the greatest achievers by outward appearance. 

And those who are greater achievers are such only by way of having greater dopamine released within their brains, which many of them have precisely because they are less willing to consider fairly and truthfully, but instead make determinations which cater to their pre-existing prejudices, and which serve to establish 'reward' for themselves.

Having the dopamine for work makes it possible, easier, and desirable to accomplish more. Often, a person's sense of visible accomplishment causes them to feel more entitled to good things than those who accomplish little in the eyes of society. They do this because they sought to justify themselves by their determinations - but no one is justified by their determinations, and rather are justified or non-justified according to the consideration by which their works are done, in the sight of all truth.

As said by Jesus: "I tell you the truth, this poor widow has given more than all the others who are making contributions. For they gave a tiny part of their surplus, but she, poor as she is, has given everything she had to live on."

So it is often the case between those who accomplish visibly little, and those who achieve many things for themselves. And many who are doctors, scientists, entrepreneurs, etc, are in fact the most lazy, self-justifying, and entitled-feeling in all society.

b)

“Sober” is a context-dependent term, and ultimately there is no such thing as a sober human being, because all human experience and exertion is manifested through the constant manipulation of all the things which both legal and criminalized drugs equally manipulate within every human's brain. Human life is a drug-fuelled experience, and the only truly sober human is a dead human.

c)

"High" is a relative term: Say the typical scholastic achiever experiences a standard dopamine level of +40, while someone with a depression, or a psychosis, or anxiety has a vastly lower standard dopamine experience level, say +2, or as low as -40. If a person with a severe state of mental stress were to suddenly be in the brain and body of a scholastic achiever, it would feel to them exactly the same as if they were on a large dose of cocaine. But to each person, their standard dopamine experience level gives them their familiarity, from which they shape their expectations and beliefs surrounding what human life is.

That level is quantifiable by the amount of released dopamine a person has relative to the amount of work which their brain is trying to accomplish. The work which a brain is trying to accomplish is not visible by outward appearance, as a brain which is engaging more work than it has dopamine for will throttle, and become stuck. And the experience to the person will be as though they are stagnant, like they don't know what they think or feel about things, and like they can't reach what they sense within their own mind. And their outward appearance can be anything, often appearing as though non-motivated or lazy, when in fact their brain simply doesn't have the dopamine to press upward against the weight of the work that is sitting in its pipelines.

d)

Even though people from all dispositions use a term of stress at various times to describe their state, it is referring to completely distinct considerations, depending upon whom it is being spoken by. A person for whom a +10 dopamine experience level is their consistent normal, will call experiencing a temporary reduction to a +5 dopamine experience level as stress, while a person for whom a +40 dopamine experience level is normal, someone like a typical doctor, will call their exposure to mere +30 dopamine experience level "stressful", and start to expect all kinds of pampering and become unwilling to exert themselves further on anyone's behalf except for their own.

And then, quite often, that doctor will unflinchingly suggest, opine, or assert that someone who feels hopeless and and undeserving of help from people while they are stuck in dopamine experience level of -5, which is the only experience they know of, is an abuser of drugs, which, when they use, might only elevate their dopamine experience level to a mere +2. The real abuse of drugs in these instances is the doctor using their dopamine to impose a false, hypocritical, and harmful determination upon a person who is innocent of what they are accused of.

And, further, doctors will place all kinds of burdens upon the most destitute of people, for them to pursue as their treatment, which they would never consider subjecting themselves to, if the relative work weight were put forth before them. They would balk at it, aghast, as if the proposition were monstrously inhumane and completely irreverent of their person.

As an example, think of the eye-opener of simulated extreme labour pains that some women feel, being given to men. Likewise, doctors have no experience to reference that would make them capable assessors of what is appropriate for mental stress ailment sufferers to be treated with. People are only able to succeed scholastically, to possibly become doctors, due to having a level of dopamine released and available within their brains that makes them entirely virgin and non-relating to the experiences of those suffering mental stress ailments. A doctor has typically never come even close to conceiving what the reality is for people with dopamine deficiency - and their doctrines surrounding dopamine and mental stress treatment are direct reflections of their lack of comprehension and qualification.

The doctors of today, whose doctrine is self-aggrandizing and serves them far more than those they impose it upon, fulfill the role of the Pharisees in Jesus' day: "For they bind heavy burdens, which are grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers."

So, what constitutes as a "high" to a person with a low standard dopamine experience level is actually viewed as a state of stress to one with a high standard dopamine experience level. A scholastically-achieving person, without any mental stress, is very 'high' 24/7, relative to a person suffering a mental stress ailment. But to both of them, their experience will be the only one that they are familiar with, and this leads to people from all dispositions using the same terms while meaning entirely incompatible concepts, without them realizing it.

ii.

Whenever a doctor tells a person that drugs are not an answer, or not a good answer, it is a tell-tale sign that that doctor is the typical institutional fact-regurgitating hack, and has no truthful connectivity in their brain between the considerations which their perceived facts bear upon one another.

Even when counselling is an answer, even when taking a walk is an answer, even when taking a few days of rest is an answer, drugs are still an inalienable part of all those answers, due to the impacts those things have on the drug levels in the person's brain: Directly or indirectly, drugs are a part of the answer.

The human brain is a massive drug bath, and a human will not get from state A to state B apart from engaging a manipulation of the drugs swilling in their brain. And while it can be laborious, long-term, and possibly futile to get that manipulation through available indirect avenues, the same difference can be fulfilled in moments, or in a relatively short period of time, by directly engaging the brain’s drug adjustment requirements.

Drugs are never an answer all on their own, as they supply a brain with its needed considerations to do its work, but they are always a part of the answer, perhaps even the only part that is missing, as they serve to enable and facilitate movement towards the considerations that mean a person’s complete healing – which is movement that is largely unavailable and non-manageable for a person apart from extraneous drug use, as is made evident by the fact that mental stress ailments actually still exist in society after over 100 years of their scientific study.

If doctors can convince people that drugs are not the answer, or not a good answer, then they set themselves up as benefactors to profit off of people’s perpetual illnesses, because drugs are always going to be a primary component to every human health answer. And the people who are convinced that drugs are not an answer are going to perpetually require assistance so long as they avoid the root causes of their issue.

If a person doesn't like having cracked lips, a dry throat, a head-ache, or discomfort permeating their entire body due to dehydration, their options are to either drink water to prevent and resolve those unfavourable conditions, or otherwise endure the outcomes of being insufficiently hydrated. Like-wise, if a person doesn't like having depression, anxiety, psychosis, schizophrenia, bi-polarity, and doesn't like being vulnerable to PTSD, alzheimer's, parkinson's, and a host of other dopamine deficiency-emergent ailments... and also if they also don't like having their potential in life bottle-necked, and them never reaching the level of accomplishment which they see and know is possible, then they can either take control of, and learn to become responsible for their brain and body's natural dynamic dopamine requirements, or otherwise endure the outcomes of not having sufficiently accepted, or tended to their body's fundamental dopamine needs.

A person does not enter into those non-favourable states, apart from having less than optimally tended to their dopamine and consideration needs.

iii.

As I have said, those who call themselves doctors and scientists have done all things wrong. Scientists mock homeopathy and other “new-age” approaches as being fantasy, and call them harmful by way of causing a person to not seek more appropriate health treatment - but doctors and scientists espouse and perform all the exact same air-headedness when they tell and attempt to convince people that drugs are not an answer, or not the answer, or not a good answer. And when scientists and doctors do so, they commit the far greater offence, because, in an act of mental abuse, and in arrogance, they impose their harmful and ignorant determinations upon others, rather than simply exercising domain over their own body by making those choices for themselves.

The only reason a doctor is even in the position to be able to try to convince another person to not view drugs as a solution (though they assuredly have always been) is because the doctor already has enough of the same drugs released available in their brain to keep them out of the afflicted states of the people they might say such things to. So, anyone telling another human that drugs are not an answer is firstly telling that person an ignorant and harmful falsehood, but is also being an egregious hypocrite, as much as there ever was.

No human ever resolved a health issue apart from the engagement drugs, because the physical human body is drug-based, and a continual orgy of drugs for as long as it remains alive - and its life is dependent upon it.

iv.

By the way, considering is movement, and anything which engages consideration is provoking movement, and changing the form of a state – and the difference between any two states is a defined set of considerations. And the state of consideration in a person is the state of their brain-wiring, which directs health or sickness, which delivers capacity to overcome or vulnerability. When a person receives the necessary consideration to improve their state via something that may be classified as homeopathy, or new-age, which they would not have otherwise engaged, then that homeopathy or new-ageness thing would have indeed served as cure. The extent to which this can be productive has never been known by institutional medicine, but everything unfurls into consideration, and there are no limits to what can be done via considering.

But the ability for a human brain to consider exists in an environment of it having ample dopamine availability.

Shrapnel

Licensed Doctors and Medications are Entirely Without Relevance to Genuine Treatment of Mental Stress Ailments

i.

The justification for many common medications rests on a trial-based framed-conclusion of "Medication X is believed to... [a listing positive objectives] ". Below I give the context for what the "is believed to" is based on, when it describes a medication.


The designs of prescribed medications for mental stress ailments are such that they locks in a person's ailment, whatever it may be, for as long as possible, while the doctor profits from seeing the patient each time they need a prescription refill, and the drug manufacturer profits from having their drugs purchased. The helpfulness of prescription medications for mental stress ailments rides the very line between potentially beneficial to some, and definitively non-helpful to all. And when a pharmaceutical company develops and markets a new medication, their barometer for a successful medication is that the medication can be, if trial results are considered in a selective, very framed manner, potentially, by surface appearance, more positive than negative for a sizeable number of people. That's not to say that it will be positive for anybody, but that it passes the most meager qualification to be technically definable as not completely negative, and hypothetically better than nothing.

If the array of medications prescribed for treatment of mental stress conditions were any less effective, they would be indisputably harmful for all who take them. The device of restraint in these medications, which makes them of extremely marginal use, when they are useful at all, is their aversion to increasing a person's dopamine availability to any meaningful measurement, if at all. And doctors tell themselves all kinds of crackpot ideas of why they would not want to allow dopamine to be increased, but the truth is that a person only has a mental stress condition because they lack the released dopamine to handle work that their brain is trying to accomplish. And so, if a doctor is not willing to address mental stress ailments like depression, anxiety, psychosis, schizophrenia, PTSD, etc, then they should say that outright, and not waste and liquidate people's lives with phony medications while pretending to be willing to address the issue, when everything they do is to avoid addressing the root cause of these issues. Then, a person can know that they'll have to go elsewhere, if they want accurate and honest treatment for their mental stress condition.


ii.

To characterize the usefulness of various medications being used to treat mental stress issues, if there were a line of usefulness neutrality, and to the right of the line were increments going from a beneficialness of +1 up to a beneficialness of +50, and to the left of the line, increments going from beneficialness of -1 to -50, then the average performance of contemporary prescription medications for metal stress would be characterized as a neutral. And again, this is by design. Pharmaceutical companies are not under a legal obligation to cure anybody, and for the sake of capitalism, they are not seeking to cure anybody. Their immense financial profits come from perpetually treating people, and having people to treat, and not from having cured people. But they, and doctors, should be upfront when people come to them for help, and tell people that they are only willing to provide what is lucrative for them, and if what they provide marginally helps the person, then that can be viewed as a bonus for the person who needs the help.

If Methamphetamine were represented in this manner, used in the best manner, it could maybe achieve a +15 in usefulness for some people, and maybe only a +5 for others.

If cocaine were depicted, used in the right manner, then cocaine can deliver a full +50 performance for the average person.


Also, doctors beliefs are very commonly filled with crackpot presumptions about how a medication is effective:
- Some of them actually believe that when a person's tolerance levels out any experience of a medication is where the medication becomes effective.
- Many think that a person showing interest in the positive effect of a medication is a warning sign that they should not be receiving any more of the beneficial medication, as if the sign of improvement over a state of suffering is to not recognize, acknowledge, or value the improvement. And a lot of people who require dopamine-increasing medications know this, and taper their expressions accordingly (just like how pharmaceutical companies taper the effectiveness of their medications so that they deliver the least-possible performance while still being marketable) - the arrogant stupidity of doctors makes dishonesty with them a necessary policy for many people, and this doesn't help things in the long run.

And there are lots of other examples of backwards thinking in professional doctor views, where they seem to be entertaining a mystical enigma of 'the cure is not the cure', 'the ailment is the answer', 'to rationalize the ailment is to be treated'.


ii.

Generally, a doctor is going to be the last person who can be trusted for informed and objective input when it comes to mental stress treatment, drug use, proper medicine application... their working information is purely ignorant fiction, not really any more relevant than medieval superstition: It's just a modern dogma. The information by which doctors are educated is heavily contrived and artificial, and is merely convention, a conduct to follow, a line of thinking to stick to, but is wholly different than the truth of positive and successful health treatment. Doctors also have no real-world experience to draw from to form opinions on the medications which they so confidently give opinions regarding. Their scholastic success was due entirely to them having a level of dopamine availability within their own brains that it leaves them comprehensively unaware of just how unaware they are when it comes to dopamine deficiency ailments.

If a person's improvement isn't obvious to them, they should seek something better, because all degrees of better exist, and have existed longer than institutional medicine's diversions and harmful myths. And if a person doesn't feel the difference a medication makes very clearly, then it isn't doing anything, and anything a person suspects it may be doing is mostly placebo (which is itself dopamine increase), and less than real. And when a person doesn't properly address a mental stress condition within themselves, they are setting their brain and body up for further issues in life, and well as concessions in their experiences, and successes. Whether aware of it or not, a doctor's role when it comes to mental stress ailments is only as a lobbyist for companies who profit off the liquidation of innocent people's lives.

Shrapnel