It Is For Each Person to be Responsible For Their Own Brain's Dopamine Needs

This post reviews the  Article: Careless Words Triggered My Depression - Increasing Dopamine Minimizes and Prevents Depression and PTSD


The woman in the linked-to article could not have prevented the words she heard from holding the relative meaning to her own considerations that she experienced, and it is not for her to control another person's beliefs and opinions. Nor would it be appropriate for a person to shield themselves off from every opinion and experience which doesn't conform to their own perspective - and if a person does this, they will be constantly reducing themselves until there is nothing left to them. But she could have provided her brain with enough dopamine to keep pace with all incoming information, to consider its positive resolution between the considerations presented to her and those already within her own mind.

And doing so would have made the conversation she engaged in produce greater worth for both her and the other person, as considerations that are engaged build on each other. Instead, her considerations were overcome by the other person's because the work presented to her brain's consideration environment was more than she had dopamine enough to handle.

The real problem in the situation is not the careless words the person spoke to her - that's an irresponsible and self-excusing position to take, and abusive of the other person's right to have an opinion, and to express it. The real problem was that the woman's ignorance of how the human body and brain function kept her from the possibility of being responsible with her own brain's dopamine situation, and kept her from being a worthy participant in the discussion which she engaged.

Had she had enough released dopamine within her brain at the time of engagement, her brain would have had the power to, while in full comfort, work proficiently enough that she could have understood the difference between the considerations presented to her, compared to her own, and seen the discrepancy between them, where they aren't adding up perfectly - just like spotting an empty parking space in a parking lot otherwise full of cars, while looking from an overhead view. And then she could have addressed that point, and settled with the other person what the truth of the matter is, or otherwise established that one of the two people simply were refusing to consider something that is unavoidably and overtly an included consideration in the full picture (just like the situation between doctors, scientists, and dopamine's contribution towards human healthiness and accomplishment).

Instead, she was ill-equipped in her dopamine disposition to have that discussion at that time, and suffered a year-long depression because of it (though it surely will impact her for longer, and in more ways than she recognizes - as she wouldn't recognize the full extent of its influence apart from having sufficient dopamine released within her brain for it, and in the article she is at a point of only blaming the other person, which is far off from having a completely truthful understanding), and she unfortunately defaulted into failing an opportunity to positively further and lead the consideration of another person, because she was under-equipped in Physio-Fuel at the time of the discussion.

As every next movement is an expression of the state of consideration established by the previous, and consideration comes to permeate all things, all human civilization has suffered because this woman didn't know the truth about her brain and dopamine. In this example, the woman of this article, and everyone beyond, has become a victim of institutional medical doctrine, of those who practice it, and of the use of scientific methodology.

The woman who wrote the referenced article provides a sign of what I wrote in this post: ... "a person’s end-of-life state is a manifestation of all the things that they didn’t take care of through considering and dopamine. A person who does not take control of this is directly investing in their future deterioration."

And this is also true about everybody in this time where society is built upon a denial of reality, and the false doctrines of sociopaths.


Consider these words spoken regarding the dopaminergic Modafinil, in the article 'Smart Drug' Modafinil Improves Memory And Cognitive Function, But Is It Ethical To Use It?, which I partly addressed in the post The Mythical Perceptions of Modafinil - Responses to Modafinil's Public Favour:

“…We now have a genuine pharmacological neuroenhancer in a scientific context,” he said, adding, “A large part of this is exploring how effects manifest at an everyday level — this really hasn't been explored yet and needs to be.”

The question now remains: Should we promote a drug that enhances human thinking within people that experience no previous problems, or is this, in some way, cheating?

Here I have just explored how not having access to "neuroenhancers" affects everyday life. This neuroenhancer is not new, it's called dopamine. And much healthier and greater performing sources of its increase exist compared to modafinil, such as cocaine. It is because of those who practice and believe in science (which is a method of falsification) that the last 100 years of health treatment have focused on denial of reality regarding dopamine's fundamental role for human wellness, functionality, and accomplishment.

The above quote is of a person looking at dopamine as though it is a new bonus tool for the people who are already the most dopamine-privileged to make use of, when in fact it is a human necessity that has been foolishly deprived from a civilization that is full of people that unjustifiably suffer for it.


Every instance of Mental Stress ailment is preventable, and each instance of Mental Stress in society is an instance of a person who has become victimized by science, doctors, institutional medical doctrine, drug prohibition, and sociopathism. It cannot be cheating to face reality and do what is physiologically mandated, and therefore responsible, any more than it is cheating to drink glasses of water to prevent dehydration so as to remain healthy and functional.

The problems caused by insufficient released dopamine in people's brains are everywhere in modern society, and the perspectives which are responsible for their existence have also set the low upper limit of what human civilization has amounted to at this point in time. Working out all Mental Stress ailments was a one-person job, to take maybe a few months, and then the time to explain it -  not millions of people a century to accomplish absolutely nothing but the perpetual further creation of its instances, and trillions of dollars worth of exploitation of those who are its sufferers.



The subject of this post is continued through this series of posts:

1. Article: Careless Words Triggered My Depression - Increasing Dopamine Minimizes and Prevents Depression and PTSD
2. It Is For Each Person to be Responsible For Their Own Brain's Dopamine Needs
3. How Careless Words Trigger a Depression
4. An Important Factor of Addiction's Existence and Prevalence in Modern Society

Shrapnel

Article: Careless Words Triggered My Depression - Increasing Dopamine Minimizes and Prevents Depression and PTSD

Article: Careless words triggered my depression

This is an example of exactly what I've just explained in the previous post:


Belief creates context between considerations, that they can consider into one state. Experience is considerations experiencing relation to one another, and because they hold a shared belief, Reason's primary principle is a commandment that causes them to consider into each other's reality.

If considerations experience relation, then according to the relation, they will filter through the body of considerations which receives it. This is what is happening in all energy transference, and applies to physical, emotional, and mental abuses that are recognized by the bodies of considerations receiving them, according to their kinds.

In a human being, most aspects of these types of things present work for the brain to consider (whether conscious or subconscious, whether for mind or body repair), and that work requires dopamine to accomplish.

...

And so dopamine deficiency takes away from a person's awareness, while dopamine's greater presence increases a person's capability to withstand and overcome negative messaging.



Memory formation, and positive memory formation is the automatic result of there being enough dopamine to consider experiences to completion. Experience is one consideration passing information to another, and every state change between considerations within the brain is a measurement of work which is only accomplished through there being dopamine to flip the relational polarity between connections until the information forms a resolution.

The depression mentioned in the article is consequence of there being inadequate released dopamine for the person to consider the message of the words received to their positive resolution. All depression emerges only from having insufficient dopamine released within a person's brain to complete the work of presented consideration into positive resolution, and the same is true regarding all PTSD.

And if it had been known at what point a person was going to encounter a sudden traumatizing experience, and if they greatly increased their dopamine availability in preparation for the event, and then didn't use their increased strength of control over their own mind to ignore the situation, but rather to engage it all the same to consider it, the impact of the experience would be far less traumatizing, and maybe they would have overcome its presented potentially-harmful considerations completely, and the outcome of the situation would not make a lasting negative impression at all.

Everything measures to perfection in its considerations, and the person who increases their dopamine-availability will still have the same amount of information presented to them for processing, but the difference is that they will be capable to process it much more proficiently and healthily than if they have less released dopamine within their brain at the time when they receive a challenging experience.


Read this message Richard Branson posted on his Twitter account:

It is unacceptable that anyone should die a preventable death in 2015: https://t.co/FxYL7vDCow pic.twitter.com/a9dZnI6Cwg

— Richard Branson (@richardbranson) November 3, 2015

100% of Mental Stress ailment is preventable, yet in 2015 on Earth there are many people who have been suffering throughout most of their lives, and many who are dying in horrible states directly caused by having had an inadequate amount of released dopamine within their brains. Humanity will not be a fully realized concept until this is fixed.



The subject of this post is continued through this series of posts:

1. Article: Careless Words Triggered My Depression - Increasing Dopamine Minimizes and Prevents Depression and PTSD
2. It Is For Each Person to be Responsible For Their Own Brain's Dopamine Needs
3. How Careless Words Trigger a Depression
4. An Important Factor of Addiction's Existence and Prevalence in Modern Society

Shrapnel

Article: Does Violence Lead to Dementia?

Article: Does domestic violence lead to dementia? Researchers urge more study


Physicists say that all things, both material and immaterial, have a frequency. Another way to put it is that all things, both material and immaterail, have a brain-wave. But the most accurate way to describe it is that all things are considering according to their kind, and what is observable and manifested is a mirroring of all the things that are being considered.

I've said that if there is full separation between considerations, to the extent of the separation, the two won't be observable within the same reality. The reality of one won't experience the other, and the other vice versa. They would be two separate existences, not aware of each other and not able to experience each other - and so exerting no influence upon each other. They will pass right through each other without effect, and each will be to the other as if non-existent.

Belief creates context between considerations, that they can consider into one state. Experience is considerations experiencing relation to one another, and because they hold a shared belief, Reason's primary principle is a commandment that causes them to consider into each other's reality.

If considerations experience relation, then according to the relation, they will filter through the body of considerations which receives it. This is what is happening in all energy transference, and applies to physical, emotional, and mental abuses that are recognized by the bodies of considerations receiving them, according to their kinds.

In a human being, most aspects of these types of things present work for the brain to consider (whether conscious or subconscious, whether for mind or body repair), and that work requires dopamine to accomplish.


Reason is immutable. Abuse sends some very negative messaging of what is the 'This is' to its recipient, and it takes a lot of work for the considerations of that messaging to be considered into a healthy resolution. The work to overcome abuses puts a very large strain on a person's dopamine budget, and lowers a brain's capability to keep the person's brain and body healthy. As I've said, many people live years, even their whole lives in a compromised state simply because there wasn't dopamine enough to get past a certain state of their consideration, and also, a person’s end-life state is a manifestation of all the things they didn’t take care of in consideration and regarding dopamine.

And again as I've said, Sociopathism came before Mental Stress, and is responsible for the creation of Mental Stress in society.



These sorts of things shouldn't require further studying any more than it is required to see if Earth's gravity applies to each next object on Earth when it's already understood that Earth's gravity applies to everything within Earth's atmosphere - the understanding is inherent, and its influence ubiquitous.

A person cannot escape the considerations they are presented, and to block them out of one's mind is to put up walls that reduce the mind, and also lead to other conditions of sickness, such as sociopathism. All the experiences which a person ever was presented still exist to be considered into one resolved perfection that weaves a person into the truth - and to do this, a person will need plenty of dopamine. In the future, it will be entirely normal for a person to increase their dopamine, just as a person drinks water and eats food daily, because dopamine is no different than those things in its vital role to human sustenance.



For all things there is an ordering of considerations, and the human body is an environment which is designed for having dopamine as a primary consideration, similar to water, and oxygen, and just as dehydration, asphyxiation, and starvation will lead to health crises, so too does having insufficient released dopamine.

We live at a time where institutional doctrine has seen to it that there are emaciated, gasping, and skeletal people all around, but it isn't widely detected because having low dopamine takes away the very awareness and understanding of a person that is fundamental to their recognizing their state - a person is not aware of the things they are not aware of, and human awareness is dependent upon there being dopamine to power the considerations that form awareness. And so dopamine deficiency takes away from a person's awareness, while dopamine's greater presence increases a person's capability to withstand and overcome negative messaging.

And those who are not of a dopamine deficient state interpret everything from the only experience they've known, that of having ample released dopamine - and so getting the picture across to these people is like describing the experience of coldness to a being which only exists in a spectrum of warm to hot. To many of them, they simply are not willing to accept that the dimension of cold, where a person doesn't even know that they don't know what positive experience is, exists.

Many who practice institutional medicine strongly do not want this to be the reality, and many of them are heavily addicted to the sentiments which they've invested into their lethal False doctrine, causing them to become non-objective while being driven by an objective to keep people away from dopaminergic use. Nevertheless, it is the reality. The question is, for how much longer will those who practice institutional doctrine be willing to be responsible for the unjust mass liquidation of innocents' lives?

The truth is always good. It is the determinations people make which cause the truth to seem undesirable to them, because by their determinations they have set their own consideration to be anti-polar to the truth.

Shrapnel

Article: Coffee Might Help You Live Longer - and Other Things of Meaning

Article: Coffee Might Help You Live Longer

Yes, coffee can help a person live longer, and protect them from many ailment conditions, because it increases dopamine-availability, and dopamine is the means by which a brain accomplishes work. Conversely, depression, anxiety, psychosis, schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, etc... all Mental Stress stems from insufficient released dopamine within a person's brain relative to the work that is trying to be considered by that brain. Cocaine, meth, crack, and many other dopaminergic substances can make a person live longer, too, even moreso than coffee.

I elucidated this first, in this post: Managing and Increasing Dopamine Can Easily Add Years to a Person's Life and Good Health

And a person who drinks coffee is equal to a person who smokes crack cocaine, in that both of them are seeking the increase in dopamine, and both of their brains fundamentally run on that very dopamine, and both of their brains benefit from that dopamine's release. There is no difference in that each of them seeks dopamine, and there is no difference in what that dopamine means to their brains.


And once again, in the above linked-to article, someone exercising Science made a mere observation within a ridiculously compartmentalized framework of being about coffee, without any understanding of its meaning (because their observation is without the knowing that comes from all considerations being inter-connected), while I had already provided the complete comprehension of the far greater reality of it all.



Another instance of everything playing out in such a manner is here: Article: Increased brain connectivity eases teenage impatience



And another is here: Can you think yourself into a different person?

While I've said all along that a brain wires and re-wires itself according to how a person considers, that a person can heal themselves of all things by belief and considering, and that a gene is a concept which considered and acceded to certainty within a person. And also that belief comes before possibility, that belief creates context between considerations, that they can be considered into one state, and that a mind is always considering towards its greatest belief.



A similar instance is here: There is Only One Truth, and It is Acting in All Things and at All Levels

... where I said "Truth is one consideration passing its full self to another without force nor resistance".

That, compared to the state of what is being perceived here: Scientists have discovered a new state of matter, called 'Jahn-Teller metals'

You could call that moment of transition in matter the 'moment of truth', where one consideration passes itself to another, causing a change in state of them both.



And there are many other such examples, some which I have made noted, and others I have not. Many things will still be merely observed by those who call themselves scientists only after I have already spoken the truth of them, and other things which before have been seemingly observed, I will speak of, having already known the full truth of them. It is and will be the same regarding all people who speak from Reason, in which all considerations are as one, and where all considerations add up to one eternal moment.



Science is fulfillment of the granfalloon - which is a meaningless association of people.

Run, it's Science!

As meaning is the product of the inter-connecting of considerations, and meaning cannot come be known through Science, because Science is the practice of making determinations based upon observation - and a determination is a falsehood by nature because it is made independently of connectivity between considerations which substantiate a thing's truth, and falsifies an outcome by short-circuiting considering. When two people speak the same words, one by a determination and the other by holding its knowing in consideration, the one who speaks by a determination speaks a falsehood, while the one who speaks from the substantiation delivered to them by considering a thing's truth speaks the truth, and only as they hear from the truth. And so the truth is speaking through that person.

A determination puts up walls between considerations, which keeps them from communicating and contributing towards a full and truthful resolution.

And the truth can only come to be known by considering all things to completion - and once all things are completed in considering, they will resolve themselves, because the truth Is - and Reason will experience, where all considerations are as one, manifesting the truth, and producing mind. And the knowing of all those considerations will be gained by the one who considered their truth.


Since is a jalopy tool of sociopaths, and it creates sociopathism with a brain and within society. And institutional medical doctrine is fraud of the most lethal kind, and is responsible for more avoidable death and suffering than almost any other source in the history of humankind.

A century of scientist conceived, endorsed, and enforced drug prohibition has killed more people than the previous century of warfare, while the truth is converse to what doctors and scientists would speak - many currently-illicit drugs can be exceptionally healthy for a person to take, far moreso beyond anything a doctor has license to provide - and a person only lives every next moment of their life from the very things which those drugs cause the greater release of acting within their brain. And a person's experience, work capability, and potential success is produced through the presence and activity of those things. Mental Stress is only the lack of natural cocaine within a person's brain, and its cure is to saturate the brain with that cocaine, the same which is released in healthier form than natural by taking real cocaine, which itself is natural.

But as I've said, what a person does while providing themselves with greater dopamine release is just as important as that they do so - and also the manner in which a greater release of dopamine is delivered can change the direction of outcome for some cases of Mental Stress ailment (a general and incomplete description of the baseline goal being to push dopamine as much as safely possible, while keeping epinephrine / norepinephrine stationary).


And to those practicing science, do not abandon the considerations you engage in work, but consider them to resolution, not by separating considerations through making determinations, but by taking all things into account so that all considerations are made equal: Every valley shall be raised up, every mountain and hill made low; the rough ground shall become level, the rugged places a plain.

There is far greater means to learn, discover, and understand than this world as a whole has yet known, which I have been making known and will continue to make known.

Shrapnel

Dopamine / Cocaine Proficiently Prevents, and Can Cure Alzheimer's

The wonder pill that could STOP your brain ageing: Common asthma drug may be a cure for Alzheimer's, claims study


Maybe you've seen this being reported around. An asthma drug, called Montelukast, has been found to produce a miraculous curative and regenerative influence in a brain with Alzheimer's ailment.

The asthma drug in question, Montelukast, is a Dopamine agonist - meaning it activates Dopamine receptors, which are normally triggered by Dopamine itself. Obviously, acknowledging that activating dopamine receptors cures an ailment is acknowledgement that the lack of dopamine to activate those receptors is the cause of the ailment, and therefore dopamine is the natural prevention and cure to that ailment.



The inflammation in Alzheimer's is aftermath of the damage caused by dopamine deficiency, so naturally, when dopamine's influence is increased (activating dopamine receptors), then the damage that causes the inflation doesn't occur, and also, as dopamine is a brain's fuel to accomplish anything, increasing its influence increases a brain's ability to clean up existing damage.

As I've said, belief is a 'This Is' command, and a mind is always considering towards its greatest belief. And as I've said, the signals in a brain are being pulled through the brain with magnetic force, and when there isn't enough dopamine to properly pass a signal, the connection can break, tear, fry, and also fuse synaptic connections, and damage their dopamine receptors. The damaged dopamine receptors in Alzheimer's, and many other Mental Stress ailments, in those who are obese, and also in those who endure "addiction", is caused by dopamine deficiency.

Having insufficient released dopamine in a person's brain is like running a car's engine without any oil in it. Everything then experiences greater wear, and eventually things start to break.



Normally, when dopamine is increased, so also does adrenaline, (epinephrine / norepinephrine), and I've also said that epinephrine / norepinephrine accelerates the processes within a brain, and therefore accelerates ailment development. And this is the reason for why dopaminergic treatment in Alzheimer's tends to become ineffective and overcome by the ailment after about 4 years of treatment. The adrenaline increase accelerates the processes within the brain, and dopamine's benefit is counter-acted, and its power to fight the ailment becomes outpaced. In such a case, the benefit of the increased dopamine is immediately perceived, while the progression of the ailment's development is gradual over the long-term, and the dopaminergic increase meant to fight the ailment actually puts power behind the ailment, feeding its continued growth.

This would not happen had cocaine been used to treat the instance of the ailment, because cocaine inhibits epinephrine / norepinephrine, which is responsible for acceleration of the ailment and the direct feeding of its continued growth.

This brutal, and completely unnecessary manslaughtering action upon innocent people, conducted by dogmatic medical professionals and their prejudice-based institutional doctrine, is not the cause of the negative and often futile outcome only in the situation of Alzheimer's treatment, but it is the same with perhaps more than half of all things that medical professionals treat people for. Institutional medical doctrine is a killer, bathed in a sterilized outward appearance, whose unnecessary victims number in the billions.



The miraculousness of activating dopamine receptors is not unique to this drug, or to Alzheimer's ailment. Mental Stress is exactly dopamine deficiency, and 100% of all Mental Stress emergent ailment (depression, psychosis, anxiety, dementia, schizophrenia, bi-polar, PTSD, OCD, fascia adhesions, and more) is preventable, and curable, by increasing released dopamine. And the best means to do which is with using cocaine, which produces the healthier-than-natural release of dopamine within a person's brain, and is about the healthiest molecule most people could ever put into their bodies.

Cocaine tends to be a 1:1 solution to Mental Stress's problem, and therefore cocaine is naturally going to be the "miracle cure" to most Mental Stress ailment - just like cocaine was perceived to be before it came into being prohibited. Though nothing has changed regarding cocaine since the time it became prohibited. It still is the perfect miracle cure for most Mental Stress emergent ailment, and every instance of Mental Stress ailment since its prohibition is an instance of a person's victimization at the hands of the people who have contributed to the sociopathism and prejudice-based doctrine behind human-physiology prohibition.

Dopamine's increase, independent of other actions such as adrenaline's increase (and therefore by extension also cocaine, by virtue of it being precisely that) is a miracle cure to a brain whose operations fundamentally depend on dopamine.



Boosting dopamine levels is good for almost everything, as everything in the human body is dependent upon the passing of signals in the brain, and the passing of those signals in the brain is dependent upon dopamine. In the situations in which it is viewed as non-favourable to boost dopamine, it is not due to dopamine's increase that unfavourable reactions occur, but due to other contingent reactions - such as adrenaline's increase.

When treating dopamine deficiency ailment, the goal is generally to push dopamine as high as possible while restraining adrenaline as much as possible. Medical professionals don't like to do this because they associate dopamine's positive feeling with no-goods getting high - well, tough.

A bit about getting high...

The human brain runs on dopamine and other drugs (opioids, seratonin, adrenaline...), and so to be"high" is to be human, and a person suffering Mental Stress ailment ought to expect to feel good within themselves, just like a healthy person - and the feeling of well-being from dopamine is a core part of what human healthiness is.

Guess what? It feels good to have a solidly-functioning and energy-filled brain and body that isn't buckling under strain, and that is assembling considerations in a positive manner rather being filled with No messaging as attempted considerings collapse into failure. And medical professionals themselves are already "high", relative to the Mental Stress states of those who need treatment for Mental Stress. All the ill-gained successes of medical professionals are fundamentally due to their being "high" from the dopamine within their brains, and many of them, hypocritically, take dopaminergics on top of their already dopamine-rich baseline state, for help in schooling, work, and also just because they can.

"High" is a measured-as-relative abstract, which doesn't describe a truth. And a person with dopamine deficiency has their dopamine budget in the red, and vitally needs to get so-called "high" to bring them into the range that's normal for a non Mental Stress-suffering person. The effect and experience of released dopamine is the foundation for human well-being, as Sigmund Freud testified:

"[Cocaine causes]… exhilaration and lasting euphoria, which in no way differs from the normal euphoria of the healthy person. You perceive an increase of self-control and possess more vitality and capacity for work. In other words, you are simply normal."

The Haves in this matter should not be preaching trickle-down physiology to the Have-Nots, and it is lunacy when a medical practitioner would steer a person away from dopaminergism, or other enjoyment-inducing drug effect, at the expense of not treating the state. Many practitioners would consider applying a potentially abusable (again, an abstract that does not express a truth) substance too risky, fearing that it might come too close to actually treating the state of suffering and ailment - and so the dogma and prejudice of such a practitioner would have caused that practitioner to become the obstacle that sits between the suffering person and their health.

And if it is allowed that sociopaths have plentiful dopamine in themselves, providing them with their capacity for work, their awareness, their feeling of well-being, and everything they have amassed for themselves, then certainly is justified and good to allow a person who suffers because of the doctrine of sociopaths, and at the hands of sociopaths, to also be given the ability to increase dopamine in themselves.





I still know the full picture for all other Mental Stress ailments, which are all branches of one shared tree (that of insufficient released dopamine), and it is nothing but pot shots to explain everything further.

The greatest obstacle to real human health in this world are the doctors, and their doctrine, both of which are heavily based in sociopathic perception. A sociopath is a truth-lacking mind, which does not consider objectively. It is only by considering objectively, free of determinations, with a will of Yes, until experiencing Reason, that consideration is gained. And a mind cannot recognize the presence of a consideration which it does not possess within itself.

It is well documented that putting a business under the direction of a sociopathic CEO can be highly damaging to that business. So why would we place the health of all the human race under the direction of sociopaths? A sociopath cannot make a truthful or good judgement, because their lack of consideration (a consideration being a quality, a quantum of truth, and a quantum of mind) means that they don't possess those qualities within themselves.



Shouldn't I be receiving pretty much all medical awards, since I have resolved the core of human physiology, from start to finish, all on my own, in rejection of science as a possible means to establish truth, and without any funding whatsoever? If just one person was capable to know the full truth of this matter, and to articulate it so well, then what in hell have millions of medical and scientific professional people been doing all this past century, and what of the trillions of dollars spent?

How many sociopaths does it take to screw in a light-bulb? If the light-bulb has any sort of truth requirement involved in its installation, then no number of sociopaths will ever be capable of screwing in that light-bulb, and that light-bulb's installation will officially be sociopath-proof. But that won't stop the sociopaths from exploiting everyone who depends on that light-bulb's light to see, live, function, and to feel well within themselves.



If a person understands Reason, they will know the answer to every thing, because in Reason everything adds up, and every premise directly begets its answer, with nothing in-between the two. The considerations of both the beginning and the end are joined in one ring and sphere of truth.

I am God, and there is none like me.

I make known the end from the beginning,

    from ancient times, what is still to come.

I say, ‘My purpose will stand,

    and I will do all that I please.’

Reason Is.

Shrapnel