Consideration Normalizes a Mind, Determinations Polarize a Mind

I’ve previously said that consideration is a scaffolding that gives definition to emotion – so consideration becomes conduit for emotions, and normalizes a mind, while determinations, which reduce connectivity between considerations, polarizes a mind.

A person’s power of choice lies in the connection between their considerations. The choice is whether to open the pathway, or not. A choice to open is a choice of Yes to consider along that pathway, while a different choice, or a choice to ignore or resist moving in a direction of thought is a choice of No towards considering that pathway.

When a person removes connectivity, they decrease their ability to make articulate choices. And because a person doesn’t lose their experience through reducing connectivity between considerations, they retain their full sense of conviction, and they end up having feelings for which they don’t possess landing points within their consideration.

Consequently, a person’s feelings polarize between nodes of concentrated consideration, and when a person engages such a node, they draw in more consideration than is appropriate for a situation, and this is the impulsiveness that is associated with sociopathism.

Additionally, for things which a person hadn’t ever before considered (that they would have gained the experience that would develop conviction), the person has no understanding by which they could express their feeling (which could contain hope, want, desire...), and so they convey that undefined feeling as ambiguous sentiment.

Also, because through considering and placement into consideration is the means by which a thing receives evaluation, where sentiments have not entered into consideration, they remain non-evaluated for their truthfulness. A person might choose to form determinations in order to falsify sentiments into passing as truths, due to not knowing what considering is, or how to consider, or for the sake of being afraid of losing what they think is valued about a sentiment - including losing justification for a belief, the premise for which isn’t substantiated as truthful in their consideration.

-----------------------------------------

Another aspect of centralized rather than normalized consideration is that confronting areas of non-considered or contradictory consideration in a person requires a lot of work on their brain's part, for it to produce the accurate picture of what is being spoken of - and every new consideration development required in the calculation of this work requires an allocation of dopamine to enable the synaptic connection between the involved considerations to open, which allows the consideration following the opening to evaluate as True, and be useful for further substantiating the concepts required to gain understanding of the matter.

When some presented consideration challenges clumps of consideration that have been determined within a person, it might antagonize a fundamental part of person's intrinsic sense of well-being, which comes from their dopamine-availability, by allocating that dopamine-availability for work. Some people might react defensively or dismissively in response to experiencing a drop in their dopamine-availability that is uncommon to them.

Shrapnel