Why is Observation a Sociopathism? + Consideration Engagement

This is continuing on from the post: The Problem with Willed-Determination & Observation Being Authority


Observation is a subjective interpretation, and is victim to all of a person's bias, preconceptions, preference, imperceptions, and constrained understanding - and, in the case of research studies, can surrender to governmental / grant-provider / study-license stipulations / bribes / coercion to emphasize, exaggerate, omit, downplay, and speculate certain aspects that completely nullify any presence of Truth in the results, making any result under such conditions a lie that goes on to poison further studies.

What is subjective is experiencing isolation.

But Truth requires full context to give it definition and value, meaning, purpose, and point. There is no Truth in what is viewed in isolated form, and the more reduced form in which a thing is viewed, the less Truth there exists in the perception that views it. This is why Lowest Common Denominator perception, which currently governs most all societal institutions (especially medical science), is a sociopathic ailment, just as Psychosis is an ailment of Mental Stress.

Whenever a subjective sense or perception is used to evaluate what is not subjective - and Truth is not subjective - it is an instance of non-consideration of the objective's reality, and is instead a projection of self-constructed delusion onto a target, while thinking the target as being responsible for what is a subjective delusion. And so it is an endeavor of aggravated Sociopathism - aggravated through being compounded, as hypocrisy is also a Sociopathism.

Observation questions 'What is?' from the obfuscated standpoint of subjectivity. But to Consider, an idea must first be accepted as potentially True, negating the question of 'What is?' and starting with a declaration of 'Because this is True...', and be engaged in the mind as if fully True. Then all details will filter through that considered-idea without any subjective influence, and produce an objective answer of how it is True - or otherwise reorganize its considerations to reveal what is instead True. This process generates all sorts of new connections between details in the mind and causes realization of all sorts of unexpected things.

The Anterior Insula doesn't deal in Falsified evaluations - that is the job of the Prefrontal Cortex.

Making Willed-determinations for the purpose of opposing some other declaration that wasn't liked, with an opinion (all opinions being unverified claims that ultimately will all appraise as either hard-True or hard-False), is sociopathic, by circumventing all consideration of what is opposed. Doing such stunts the development of the Anterior Insula, whose considering is the mechanism of human evolution - and the lack of its engagement for consideration is the nature of the devolution that is ongoing in the average human brain.

Open-endedness in the mind is key to every unknown thing, as it causes related considering to continue subconsciously in the person who didn't sociopathically make a Willed-determination for no good reason.

Acknowledging an unknowing, and not closing its preceding thought (which is a Willed-determination upon Self-belief), but letting it run openly to consider itself all on its own, is producing of smarts - and is converse to what is common. Every thought should be left open to keep evolving itself. It will finalize all on its own when it is resolved - when it experiences Reason and Reason encapsulates it, making it a recollectable concept.

Shrapnel