A Reason is a concept and a concept is a Reason - Part 1

...but a Reason is not itself Reasoning, while Reasoning is not a Reason, but creates them by all of its actions.

The mind runs on concepts, and in fact, then whole universe does. For Truth to exist, there must be context – and nothing is formed for existing all on its own, without accompaniment – because there is no value, meaning, reason for what is without the difference that creates its appreciability.

This is a significant reason why Scientific Method observations are dependably invalid: they’re observed as individually-existing specimens of all-separated data, and labeled based on their isolated presences - often erroneously even by that concession. But the identity of a detail is only surmizable when you look at the specimen as only one part of its greatest perceptible potential - a something's/somebody's greatest potential is their True definition. Science literally evaluates by the lowest common denominator, without ever considering that maybe lowest common denominators are not the best suited to determine Truth, Truth being the literal antithesis of LCD. I'm gonna fit LCD into Sociopathism as one of its sub-ailments - and there are a whole slew of Socioipathic traits, just as there are for Mental Stress ailment... which blind Science starts counting only at Psychosis - but Psychosis is what emerges from severe mental stress, and mental stress is born solely from low Prefrontal Cortex dopamine. This is because Mental Stress isn't very real to people who don't have disposition for it (and is regularly nothing impressive to those who can associate such with personal experience - maybe people who suffer from it, as opposed to those who do not, ought to be asked for what its real value is), and an unspoken semi-requirement to achieve profession as one who creates ailment recognition is to not be prone to Mental Stress, because:

Scholastic success is primarily dependent upon memorizing subject information, and working memory is 100% Prefrontal Cortex dopamine surplus over Anterior Insula requirement.

Mental Stress, and all its emergent ailment is precisely the lack of Prefrontal Cortex dopamine, per an Anterior Insula's workload and output to the Prefrontal Cortex.

...

Btw, increased dopamine-availability is exactly Cocaine's effective result: Cocaine inhibits this dopamine's reuptake while inhibiting nor/adrenaline uptake, which means that it causes there to be greater active-use-ready dopamine, while reducing the rate at which nor/adrenaline sympathetically releases to dopamine regulatory shifts. This consequently means that Cocaine's dopaminergism is a healthier dopamine release than what otherwise naturally releases in the brain - but all research is chosen, constructed, and carried out, and then interpreted by those with ample dopamine, and so that answers absolutely everything regarding conventional comprehension of not just Cocaine, but all dopaminergics, and everything else, further. PS - Cocaine is the only dopaminergic which blocks nor/adrenaline, and it does so significantly while also providing the most proficient dopamine upregulation that is free of ancilliary effects.

Adderall is a clone of Methamphetamine, triggering the same metabolic mechanisms via a compound of 3 amphetamines, as opposed to the one methamphetamine, and probably developed almost exclusively for the sake of circumventing Methamphetamine's tightened regulation, after its public image degraded. That's not a insult to Adderall, as Methamphetamine was victim of negative typecasting rather than Reason. The move to produce a clone, if that was the objective, was smart, as the drug has good application (notably for those without the Prefrontal Cortex dopamine that is its sought feature), and so it was well Reasoned, contrary to Methamphetamine's restriction tightening - since both upregulate dopamine, adrenaline, and seratonin - but Methamphetamine is consistently cited by those who have need to (and so do) use both to be less hostile towards their anxiety (indicating that Methamphetamine has a superior Dopamine to Adrenaline ratio). And those needing Prefrontal Cortex dopamine are exactly who are susceptible to anxiety. I wonder if any researchers ever figured this out, as it doesn't reflect in medicinal regulations... or treatment considerations.

All other dopaminergics subsequent to Cocaine produce a large sympathetic nor/adrenaline activity increase - which is negating of all the benefits which the Prefrontal Cortex regulated dopamine increase, while that dopamine upregulation is precisely what most dopaminergics are produced for. There is practically no time that nor/adrenaline increase is a positive thing, and when it's only an unintentional . Dopamine and Adrenaline are, where dopamine-treatment is purpose, effectively full-antitheses, with dopamine being strength of control of mind, being what processes thoughts (conscious and subconscious) while Adrenaline is what increases the circulatory-system, which increases the cycle-rate of the Anterior Insula, which greatly increases the amount of work the Anterior Insula is outputting to the Prefrontal Cortex, which greatly increases the required amount of Prefrontal Cortex dopamine-availability supplementation that is required to handle all of it.

So every dopaminergic, apart from the one that is True-evaluating per the objective of dopaminergics taken for being dopaminergics (Cocaine), is regularly available - and Adderall is a top prescription in North America, thrust upon all ranges of people, from children to whatever older age.

If that doesn't strike you as meaning that many doctors and parents are forcing their elementary-school children to take Methamphetamine daily because it increases their elementary-school-grades, then you aren't thinking about it as it exactly is equal-to. However, if you think that's a bad thing, well, that's also baseless apart from knowing specific reasons why, which are idosyncratic to specific cases.

Meth is exactly releases of 3 human-vital chemicals ('cept for seratonin - useless hanger-on) that your body runs on, and 2 of which supply the foundation for the body to 'not be dead' and also 'not-existing in the first place'... with dopamine being what provokes adrenaline's reciprocal release.


Face it: your body and brain run on Methamphetamine and Cocaine, and cliched work-success is achieved by having higher-than-average levels of 'natural-Cocaine' in the Prefrontal Cortex brain-region - which is accomplished by considering little, which, for some people, I'm sure suits the predisposition, might even be done out of want to not put dent in that brain-regional surplus availability of dopamine, maximizing that 24/7 natural Cocaine high.

To a person who has ample of this regional-dopamine, who titillates themselves with a study of it at some point in their career, their self-determined result-meanings are filtered through the unchallenged and never-proposed-for-questioning invalid-dogma which forms out of their experience with what is their lazily-untapped potential (that dopamine in their brain). To a person who has been responsible with their mind development, and consideration towards all things, Cocaine is the most healthy molecule such a person could ever put into their body - because its resultant dopaminergic-effect is exactly, not close, but exactly that which created their brain-and-body in their mother's womb, and that which supplies all of a person's smarts and motor functions, and that which exclusively allows for controlled access to their capabilities - if it's in sufficient regional-availability.

Cocaine is not direct-cause of an effect, itself. It instructs the regulatory-mechanism which takes dopamine out of active-circulation to lower its objective removal-quota for a ~45 minute period - without side-effect compromises. To emphasize that reality, Cocaine doesn't just not-do anything further unnecessarily, but what it does do further is in total-servitude of its primary function, and decreases nor/Adrenaline's sympathetic availability to an astoundingly naturally-appropriate compensatory ratio - seemingly producing only minimal nor/Adrenaline increases per significant regulatory-dopamine increase, as if the resultant active-dopamine released all on its natural-own, bearing no abnormality. And that's really it. For everything that is targeted with other dopaminergics, Cocaine will be the far-superior application - and I propose, and through a degree of substantiated-certainty, that it is capable to cure every Psychosis within hours (presuming every case is idiosyncratic is a necessary preemption of Science's idiosyncracy in everything - a resolution to a cause must be consistent if it's True, or it is no better than just another arbitrary bullshit-of-Science), though very-importantly through comprehension of all-else that's involved in a Psychosis - and particularly all treatment-process considerations - and, necessarily, a treatment-process' consideration-ordering is key to delivering this resolute power. Consideration is significantly about detail-ordering - and once I recall where all this subject's comprehension-stuff was written I'll let the comprehension pull itself together into a perfect form for providing.

Cocaine == Prefrontal Cortex dopamine == Working Memory. That is important to know from here on out.

Shrapnel

Addendum to The Meaning of 'Consideration'

The below-given meaning of Consideration goes very well with...

All Truth is a Singularity, Navigable In Full by Reason

Shrapnel

The Meaning of Consideration

... Everything is everything, and everything is everything else - but everything is everything else in the right place, in the right time, in the right moment, in the right order, in the right person...

That is the meaning of Consideration

Shrapnel

Time is a Hard Bullshit, and a Sociopathism - a Consideration

Because everything is made of energy, which is produced through the transitioning of considerations, everything is cycling, inter-dependently.

The planets, stars, galaxies, and everything of matter and energy all run on cycles, and so does the human brain and body. All energy cycles, and all things made of energy adhere to energy’s precepts. Everything within this universe is subject to cycles.

Time compresses and expands based upon these cycles, and what is totally contained within a parent-cycle is not necessarily perceptive of anything beyond that cycle. This means that inner-time could remain consistent between a series of cycles, but it also means that the same inner-time could fluctuate between 2 years per cycle, or 2 billion years per cycle – and in both cases the same amount of work would be produced per cycle, and leave the same traces for later observation.

What this means for carbon-dating is that the figures assigned to dates are surely totally bogus. A perceived rate-of-decay for a 2 billion year span could have at one point taken 2 days, or 2 trillion years.

All that can be said by the measurement of activity-dating is what time could have added up to, if all previous cycles continued at the rate which has been observed in the last however many years – and the likeliness of that seems like a pretty small slim-chance of a long-shot, to put it subtly. Observation is no means to establish what is true, and all observation is wholly subjective. Observation is irrelevant to Truth, and Truth is irrelevant to Reason - as Reason produces, defines, and even re-defines Truth by re-ordering the universe's considerations.

Reasons can be fulfilled or failed, but not changed or erased. What is failed will still require fulfillment later on – though it will be dis-preferential to that which causes the failure. What fails is the encapsulation of those considerations which did not experience resolution, which then disperse - and that encapsulation’s identity is then gone until something else restores it, making that identity subject and dependent upon that which restores it. One cycle sits within another - rather than many cycles sharing the same space. However, cycles can sync, and sync’d cycles are as one – this is the reality of the Mind.

Right now, everything that will ever happen to a person, and including their exactly-precise 'death', is all a defined factor – dependent upon everything, as altogether. It is all tuned to certain cycles beyond this point. How long it will take to reach a certain forthcoming cycle-resolution, is dynamic. What form a thing manifests by is always subject to change – but the defining goals of all different cycles will always be accomplished at the time of each’s completion.

Whether a person ‘dies’ old or young, violently or peacefully, comfortably/torturously, through physical expiration or a transcendence that overcomes all physicality – it’s all irrelevant to the Universe’s Reason. One way or another, a purpose/objective will come to be resolved. The Universe will always capitalize on its Reason, and the considerations that form a person’s makeup can be smashed and reassembled as needed to fulfill it – but their allocation and encapsulation may change.

Also related is: The Illusion of Time

Shrapnel

Hey

I've decided I'm going to rest for a few days before posting anything further here - I'm just mentioning it for anyone who likes to see if anything new is posted daily. I've got lots I want to move ahead with, but I'm not sure on what would be best to present, and how I should want to present it, so I'm going to relax and think about it for a bit. Just a few days, though.

Primary Principle of... Emotion-Based Reactions

That the emotional-depth-sense from Ant-Ins development is always in-effect once developed, and that Pref-Cort determination occurs precisely by omitting Ant-Ins' Understanding/Comprehension consequently presents the principle for emotion-based reactions.

However faintly-recognizable the touch is, a disparate Pref-Cort thought-branch starts with an arbitrary judgment and concludes with an evaluation of 'Self', all of which is contributes in making it emotion-based. I think that an initial arbitrary judgment always gets its impetus and finds its direction from personal emotional sentiment.

This is also the cause of Pref-Cort dopamine-surplus' being associated with impulsiveness.

I like Impulsivity more than Impulsiveness, but it spell-checks as wrong. I think it sounds more right, though. Maybe English is wrong.

Shrapnel

Cognition of Emotional Response and Emotional Vulnerability

This post considers the distinctions between Emotional Reaction, Emotional Depth, and Emotional Fragility.



Considering, Understanding, Comprehending all form scaffolding that prevents emotionally-impulsive reactions - and where emotion is responding, something of those other things is absent. However, in Reasoning, emotion and contemplation are both fully present, and normalized as one healthy form.

The development of all these things creates the backdrop of potential for deeper emotion, but they don't cause emotion to drive responses.

A lack of these things causes Prefrontal Cortex determinations to provoke responses based upon emotions, and every Prefrontal Cortex unilateral decision is one based upon personal emotion - whether the response is of positive feel or hurt feel or angry feel, all Prefrontal Cortex unilateral decision is emotion-based, and the Prefrontal Cortex is the nexus of emotional reaction.

However... Anterior Insula development provides the potential for deeper emotion as the availability of emotional-headroom grows alongside the development of Consideration, Understanding, Comprehension, Reasoning.

How this leads back to Ant-Ins development associating with emotional vulnerability is this:

Where there is higher Ant-Ins development, there is a need for greater Prefrontal Cortex dopamine to handle its output - and when there is a deficiency of Prefrontal Cortex dopamine, Ant-Ins' Comprehension-etc isn't able to supply the scaffolding for the same emotional-potential it created (the senses from which are always in-effect once developed), and so unstable Prefrontal Cortex determining is all that's left to react to a situation. That determination forms the basis for an emotion-based reaction, and is not the reaction, itself.


So the Anterior Insula development creates emotional depth, and also the potential for emotional reactions - and that potential becomes realized when the Prefrontal Cortex' regulated dopamine is insufficient to handle the Anterior Insula's output. But emotional reaction is purely a device of the Prefrontal Cortex, while a particular emotional vulnerability is strictly Prefrontal Cortex dopamine insufficiency.

Emotional reaction can occur with and without notable Ant-Ins development, and all Pref-Cort unilateral action is emotional - but higher Ant-Ins development met with Pref-Cort dopamine deficiency provokes emotion-based sensations in a person as that Pref-Cort dopamine deficiency disallows recipience of Understanding/Comprehension for whatever is invoking the reaction.


Any notion that Considering, Understanding, Comprehending and emotional vulnerability co-exist is wholly incompetent: They are antithetical.

Shrapnel

The Prefrontal Cortex is the Blank-Template Consideration of 'Self'

I've wondered if anyone would have noticed, but... the Prefrontal Cortex presents exactly an empty husk of a Consideration:

Everything the Prefrontal Cortex does is done on every single act of considering, and within everything that is built from considering - but, where done within Consideration, the action of deciding all the same parameters of the Prefrontal Cortex is handled internally in the Anterior Insula, and it receives direction based upon the value, meaning, purpose, and point of that consideration's context within its sympathetic/empathetic considerations.

The Prefrontal Cortex is power to encapsulate Considering, to produce new Considerations - and on its own lacks any value, meaning, purpose, and point.

This is why a Prefrontal Cortex's dopamine level that is less than its brain's Anterior Insula development requirement is definitively deficient in dopamine: Whatever Consideration-work leaves the Anterior Insula must be met with same-quantity Prefrontal Cortex dopamine, as it is a clone/import of that work, and then still a bit extra regulated-dopamine is needed for the Prefrontal Cortex to encapsulate all that work and produce a completely employable piece of Reasoning (or towards that end of the thought-value spectrum).

Any disparate consideration that stands alone and apart from a context with other considerations can only ever evaluate to 'Self'. The Prefrontal Cortex, on its own, is a context-less consideration that has no value, meaning, purpose, or point... and apart from the provocation of first receiving full substantiation from the Anterior Insula's value-based calculations, it will always only evaluate to 'Self' - and so the Prefrontal Cortex is the centre for all sociopathic mannerism.

Consider a branch from a tree: Thought crafted through the Prefrontal Cortex is like crafting a branch that doesn't connect to any tree, which would connect it to the ground, and to the world. It is imagined, whimsical, fanciful, and its determination is a certain-Falsehood. This is why Pref-Cort dopamine-surplus' are associated with impulsiveness: However faint the touch, the disparate Pref-Cort thought-branch starts with an arbitrary judgment and concludes with an evaluation of 'Self', all of which is contributes in making it emotion-based.

When the Anterior Insula first supplies need for the Prefrontal Cortex to encapsulate a group of calculated-considerations into a new, full concept, creating a new consideration, the encapsulation it receives from the Prefrontal Cortex establishes a hard value, meaning, purpose, and point - and that new consideration's definition is then observed in the Anterior Insula.

Shrapnel